incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jianyuan Li <lijianyuan1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Call-For-Review]Two shape geometry bugs
Date Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:28:24 GMT
I think the geometry difference between AOO and MS can be taken as a
feature gap. And the fill difference is the result of the feature gap when
import/export.

2012/9/11 Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de>

> Hi Jianyuan,
>
> Jianyuan Li schrieb:
>
>  Hi, Regina,
>> Thanks for the good catch. I agree with you. See my comments in bugzilla.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jianyuan
>>
>
> It remains the problem, that the corresponding shape in PowerPoint has
> different kind of filling than the shape in AOO.
>
> Perhaps it is possible to generate a new shape during import without
> adding it to any toolbox? In that way the shape would look the same as in
> MS Office documents. And such generic import would give other still missing
> shapes too.
>
> AOO can handle arbitrary custom shapes in ODF format. They do not need to
> be in the predefined collection. But I don't know, whether MS Office has
> this ability too. Therefore a round trip might be problematic.
>
> Kind regards
> Regina
>
>
>
>> 2012/9/10 Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de>
>>
>>  Jianyuan Li schrieb:
>>>
>>>   Hi, all,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have fixes for 2 shape geometry bugs. Can anyone help review? More
>>>> details can be found in bugzilla comments. Thanks.
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/****show_bug.cgi?id=120848<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=120848>
>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_**bug.cgi?id=120848<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120848>
>>>> >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/****show_bug.cgi?id=120870<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=120870>
>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_**bug.cgi?id=120870<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120870>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  I'm not sure about issue 120870. The current definition leads to three
>>> separate fillings and to breaking up into three polygons. Is that
>>> behavior
>>> preserved?
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Regina
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message