incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Harbison <dpharbi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed PMC Chair
Date Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:19:21 GMT
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:06 AM, imacat <imacat@mail.imacat.idv.tw> wrote:
> On 2012/09/28 10:55, Yong Lin Ma said:
>> I would also like to nominate
>>       Donald Harbison (dpharbison)

I decline this nomination in favor of Andrea Pescetti.

>>        Louis Suarez-Potts (louis)
>>        Pedro Giffuni (pfg)
>> as candidates of the PMC Chair.
>
>     I suppose we have only one chair.  Are you really sure you want to
> nominate more than one person?  This might mean potential conflict on
> which one you support.

Yes, please select one nominee from your list of (3). It will
streamline the overall process.
Thank you.

>
>>
>> They are all well known in the community.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Andrew Rist <andrew.rist@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> I would like to nominate Andrea Pescetti.
>>> Andrea is one of the most active and well respected members of the project,
>>> and I believe he would make a great PMC Chair.
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/27/2012 2:42 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Moving right along...
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to restart the discussion over choosing a PMC Chair.  The
>>>> previous proposed process was discussed in:
>>>> http://markmail.org/message/mrgnjtiuum5bovjd
>>>> I'd like to take up where that left off.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the process (with minor modifications) from the original:
>>>>
>>>>    You can read about the duties of a PMC Chair here:
>>>>    http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair
>>>>
>>>>    1) Nominations would be open for 72 hours.  Anyone can nominate
>>>>    someone for the role.  Self-nominations are fine.  And of course
>>>>    nominations can be declined.
>>>>
>>>>    2) If there is only one nomination, then we are done, provided there
>>>>    are no sustained objections.
>>>>
>>>>    3) If there is more than one nomination we discuss on the list for
>>>>    another 72 hours.  Discussion would primarily be on ooo-dev, but some
>>>>    subjects might be directed to ooo-private.
>>>>
>>>>    4) If after 72-hours discussion there are still two or more nominees
>>>>    then we vote.  Everyone would be welcome to vote, but binding votes
>>>>    would be from PPMC members.  If there are more than 2 candidates,
>>>>    there will be a run-off vote between the top two nominees if none of
>>>>    the nominees receive an outright majority.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (note: the last item was changed from the original - nothing more
>>>> complicated than a two way run-off is needed, as it is unlikely we have more
>>>> than two nominees.)
>>>> I think this process is straight forward enough that we should just begin
>>>> the process now.
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> imacat ^_*' <imacat@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
> PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
>
> <<Woman's Voice>> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
> Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
> Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
> Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
> EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
> Greenfoot Taiwan http://greenfoot.westart.tw/
>

Mime
View raw message