incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From TJ Frazier <tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com>
Subject Re: [QA] Quality of bug reports and QA in bugzilla
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:54:38 GMT
On 9/20/2012 00:12, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 19.09.2012 20:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
>>> Hi Regina,
>>>
>>>> Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
>>>> your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
>>>
>>> i am pretty sure that i did not set the "confirmed" status when
>>> submitting a new issue,
>>> default status is "confirmed" - and you have to select "Show Advanced
>>> Fields"
>>> to see the listbox ... this seems to be the root cause of the problem
>>> ...
>>
>> I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
>> even if the reporter has canconfirm privileges. IMHO "confirmed" means
>> "confirmed by some else".
>
> Seeing so much consensus I'm confident that we'll reach "lazy consensus"
> by next monday (2012/9/19 + 72h) and I volunteer to change the behavior
> then.
>
> So please speak up now if you disagree with the opinion that the extra
> step to the "confirmed" status is an idea that does benefit the quality
> of our project.
>
> Herbert
>
+1

Just for the record, is this as simple as removing the check-mark from 
one entry in BZ > Administration > Bug Status Workflow ?

/tj/



Mime
View raw message