incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reizinger Zoltán <>
Subject Re: [QA] Quality of bug reports and QA in bugzilla
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:25:05 GMT
2012.09.19. 14:49 keltezéssel, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann írta:
> Hi,
> On 19.09.2012 14:41, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 9/19/12 2:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
>>>> Hi Regina,
>>>>> Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
>>>>> your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
>>>> i am pretty sure that i did not set the "confirmed" status when 
>>>> submitting a new issue,
>>>> default status is "confirmed" - and you have to select "Show 
>>>> Advanced Fields"
>>>> to see the listbox ... this seems to be the root cause of the 
>>>> problem ...
>>> I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
>>> even if the reporter has canconfirm privileges. IMHO "confirmed" means
>>> "confirmed by some else".
>> I didn't checked it by myself but I agree the default should be 
>> unconfirmed.
> I checked it.
> With an account with canconfirm privileges "confirmed" is the default 
> status.
> I agree that this needs to be changed.
I not agree fully.

In lot of cases I submit a bug found by others, submitted on forums, 
checked by me before I submit a new bug.
In these case the "confirmed" could be the best deafault.

In other cases the "unconfirmed" is the best deafult value, but the 
"confirmed" value, need to be selectable
to the reporters with "canconfirm rights".


> Best regards, Oliver.

View raw message