incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <orwittm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [BUILD] atlthunk
Date Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:31:34 GMT
Hi Herbert,

On 11.09.2012 13:17, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 10.09.2012 22:19, Andrew Rist wrote:
>> do you know the context for this change?
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1343720 - "force
>> atlthunk addition when linking with atls library"
>> The lack of atlthunk is stopping the build and the file doesn't seem to
>> be in VS 2008 pro.  (Or is there something I did not install when
>> installing VS 2008?)
>
> With the free MSVC2008 Express being the baseline for AOO development on Windows
> the atlthunk addition was needed to enable the build of a fully functional
> product, because MSVC2008 Express does not contain the ATL libraries, but the
> free WDK contains all that is needed including the atlthunk lib.
>
> Requiring an expensive Pro version to build it would be prohibitive for hobby
> developers.
>
> BTW: Chromium has the same issue and the instructions there apply here too.
> If you use Visual Studio 2008 Express:
>      Install the WDK for the ATL headers and libs from e.g.
>      http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=11800
>      Verify MSVC|Tools|Options|Projects and Solutions|VC++ Directories has
> Include: [WDK]include\atl71 and Lib: [WDK]lib\Atl\i386 where [WDK] is the WDK
> install directory.
>
> Another solution would be to detect that atlthunk is not needed because the
> --disable-atl configure switch is active or disable linking to the atlthunk if
> an MSVC version containing atl directly is installed.
>
> Another alternative would be of course if we demanded that everyone wanting to
> build a fully functional AOO is required to get the Pro version. Is that
> something we could strive for?
>

I think you misunderstood my intention.

I am aiming for something which enables building with VS 2008 Express _and_ with 
VS 2008 Pro.
And yes, VS 2008 Express should be the default assumed environment from my point 
of view.

As far as I know the above referenced code change is only one part of enabling 
the build of VS 2008 Express with ATL enabled - see issue 118821

[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118821


Best regards, Oliver.

Mime
View raw message