incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: [DL][Website] First draft of the new DL scripting
Date Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:11:58 GMT
Am 09/10/2012 11:53 AM, schrieb J├╝rgen Schmidt:
> On 9/6/12 11:52 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 09/06/2012 01:33 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/02/2012 03:18 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/02/2012 08:02 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was busy at the weekend to clean-up the DL scripting.
>>>>>
>>>>> The new webpages are accessible here (as long as they are not
>>>>> published):
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/index.html
>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/other.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Some notes before you start with checking out:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.
>>>>> The current focus is on reducing complexity, better simplification and
>>>>> more automatism. Not the design and layout. This is nearly the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2.
>>>>> It's normal that not all links will work as it's only a part of the
>>>>> download area. It depends on the link itself if it's not yet working
or
>>>>> really broken. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.
>>>>> When you find errors and want to report them please make sure to browse
>>>>> to the following webpage to help me with some debug data:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/analyze.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Next big step is to implement the new directory structure on the
>>>>> mirrors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance for your comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Marcus
>>>>
>>>> VERY good! I am looking at changes in svn and I can see MUCH
>>>> improvement. I will try to help with suggestions in the coming week.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ...more
>>>
>>> You are making very good progress and I hesitate to just make changes
>>> without discussion.
>>>
>>> What do you suggest for this?? Additional sections on the wiki page??
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Improvements+for+the+download+webpages
>>>
>>
>> Hm, I've already created a new table in the Wiki to document the
>> separating the general improvements from the one towards the new mirror
>> structure.
>>
>> But I think this is now enough. Otherwise the overview is really gone.
>>
>>> attachment of pertinent files to the wiki page with comments?
>>
>> When the things are discussed and done then these data normally remains
>> - at least this is my impression from other Wiki pages. Then the is also
>> gone. Besides this I think it becomes very fast a real clutch.
>>
>> Let's see if we can make some progress here on the ML. When there is
>> something valuable, then we can take it over to the Wiki page. So, I
>> would suggest to create new threads with appropriate tags like "[DL
>> scripting][SCHEMA] ..."
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>
> I think we can finalize the future directory structure #part 2 on the
> wiki page.
>
> Current proposal:
> .../ooo/<VERSION>/source/
> .../ooo/<VERSION>/bin/<LANG>/
> .../ooo/<VERSION>/bin/SDK/
>
> When I remember there were some concerns regarding "bin". And I would

Hm, I don't know if it makes really a difference in case of names on 
mirrors. ;-) But OK, let's call it "binaries".

> keep the project name open or flexible assuming a change in favor of "aoo".
>
> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/source/
> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/<LANG>/
> .../<PROJECT_NAME>/<VERSION>/binaries/SDK/
>
>
> Where PROJECT_NAME is something like "ooo" or "aoo" or "openoffice". I
> would say we need no voting for this and need further discussion only if
> somebody see some problems with the new proposed structure.

So, waiting for the final definition. For the moment I'll use "aoo" for 
my testing.

Marcus


Mime
View raw message