incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [QA] Quality of bug reports and QA in bugzilla
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:34:30 GMT
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:52:44PM +0200, O.Felka wrote:
> Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> >>
> >>>Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
> >>>your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
> >>
> 
> >I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
> >even if the reporter has canconfirm privileges. IMHO "confirmed" means
> >"confirmed by some else".
> >
> 
> We have a lot of professional QA folks here: They know how to verify
> their findings and issues. That's a lot of overhead if someone has
> to re-test to confirm a well tested bug.
> So we should trust the QA who has 'canconfirm' privileges.

I don't see much overhead; on the contrary, every careful reporter,
after pressing "Submit", surely goes and check if he did fill everything
ok.  Leaving the default status to unconfirmed works just like
a reminder to be careful.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina

Mime
View raw message