incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pedro Giffuni <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [code] building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native
Date Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:07:52 GMT
Hi Oliver;

To be honest, I have no idea why we are getting the linking error,
but yes if defining your own local scope_array function stops the
error , it's OK. This is debugging code so we can live with the
duplicity.

FWIW, I noticed the build on linux is broken due to a checksum
mismatch in the English dictionary :(.

Pedro.



>________________________________
> From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <orwittmann@googlemail.com>
>To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org 
>Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:32 AM
>Subject: Re: [code] building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native
> 
>Hi,
>
>Hi,
>
>
>On 19.09.2012 20:00, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 19.09.2012 08:44, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>>>>   Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>   On 19.09.2012 04:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>>>>>   Hi again;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I tried something in revision 1387438: basically I preserved some
>>>>>>   configuration changes from the previous patchset.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Thanks
>>>>>   I will try.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The build with --enable-dbgutil still breaks in setup_native.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I did a small cleanup of the FreeBSD specific patch but sadly,
>>> I am afraid I ran out of my Windows-fu :(.
>>>
>>> I found this
>>> http://cubicspot.blogspot.com/2007/06/solving-pesky-lnk2005-errors.html
>>>
>>>
>>> I think it may be something really simple, but we need a Windows
>>> expert here.
>>>
>>> It would be really sad to have to revert the update so I hope someone
>>> steps in!
>>>
>>
>> I do not think that it is needed to revert the boost update.
>> The problem only occurs when building with --enable-dbgutil and it is quite easy
>> to get rid of the boost::scoped_array usage in the corresponding small code
>> snippet.
>>
>
>Does the attached patch make sense in order to get rid of the problem by 
>removing the usage of boost::scoped_array?
>
>Thx in advance for your feedback.
>
>Best regards, Oliver.
>
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message