Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5033D19D.9040508@apache.org>
References: 
 <CAP-ksoiLjUfioHfQ4JuVeKneWdrkJdESWAD9RLYVYiZ_PrAFoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksoh+EA7_9ZVxVfpQNtd7Z0vgqDiQX30+Kdd3EwUq5m=W=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<501AF438.70707@wtnet.de>
	<k0n67o$sue$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<502F45FD.5060007@wtnet.de>
	<CAP-ksoiAokei-1rphRZBzz6Xb1xdO=D92_T3u-rOcsN7Wacieg@mail.gmail.com>
	<502FA122.3070004@wtnet.de>
	<CAP-ksoi9mDCzcOggRTTbSkAA7EoZLir928XYbEZ=UASNDq-2rQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<502FA8DE.5010300@wtnet.de>
	<502FC42D.7000101@wtnet.de>
	<502FC874.5030908@wtnet.de>
	<1345311017.5334.2.camel@sybil-gnome>
	<50302211.9050006@wtnet.de>
	<1345337148.2331.16.camel@sybil-gnome>
	<5030BDD9.6000202@wtnet.de>
	<CAP-ksohXPdWLXAYnX1CW84mqi+qjVdkcDtb6z1rfe+cfDRMbHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGj3214g7RbjkDqKzU=C5Vj0-1vwWfnxP0FWfxX2vH+j_6vWpw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5032180A.3090108@apache.org>
	<5032637C.2090905@gmail.com>
	<5032988E.8070701@wtnet.de>
	<5032ADD7.6000209@gmail.com>
	<5032C721.2070906@apache.org>
	<CAP-ksojvNXH43ebCF8ZfaFV8+x0JPwvB+aJUJo7KpJ6_SKR+pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5033D19D.9040508@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:29:23 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAP-ksojbqgY1J9BQi+W2dUMUu8V7Nf8naL6vR3QWFyGyG9TrHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What to say in AOO 3.4.1 release announcement about the ports?
 (BSD, Solaris, OS/2)?
From: Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pescetti@apache.org> wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> I agree that we should have some mention of other versions or
>> distributions that are based on AOO code, even if they are not
>> strictly "ports".  The question is where to mention them?
>
>
> So far only winPenPack showed up, so for version 3.4.1 it seems natural to
> just use the
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/porting/index.html
> page (which will be published online) and list it there.
>

I wonder... if we changed the title/header of that page to say "Ports
and Distributions", but kept the same contents, would that make
everyone happy?

-Rob

> Regards,
>   Andrea.