Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-25107-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5D7D916B
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 80476 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 80408 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 80399 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:28:26 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kay.schenk@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.47] (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com)
 (209.85.215.47)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:28:18 +0000
Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so630733lag.6
        for <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=ZzJQn8CORNHzslbJko8t0dsZGBvlMua064X0Z4WkUd0=;
        b=qs3UasPHQbSsk3jdINfN2FEuOydBwrHHtQJx0xv7aoGDvqj181OqVk+ZF0yNGlnDR7
         fhDXQsegU0/HfpIic6WccCRVARfaVWdph0H+l8bicGrFbEnu1vUEQI58Jv56tr06aBxy
         H2PRrR7ZWEqxGVvsOdnVo3kOrvSoLSQOfsq2IF3EKk9BZQqb6NrU5Dwfl0Qo2rFv3alp
         +FT1wfoL8lMMOrFo01GQKFRE6BBgrFgUiFuF9x646VwNh3vEQbV658FcOXnMSuXOiJBd
         Hsu1MRR0/pHqSsfCpEYWcDSHzTpMlwf0l4bZDlVY5/xWxOhH1HVP01bXqG6GLVxvt/KI
         dCDQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.131.42 with SMTP id oj10mr2901378lab.49.1345750078493;
 Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.32.6 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:27:58 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAGj3215hgR+HS7mFiS5O6xMbL8dxXteYWJWjVvsQuSk=j_g__A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: proposed new directory structure for future releases
From: Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com>
To: ooo-dev <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0430896e62923604c7f3db71

--f46d0430896e62923604c7f3db71
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Way back in late April, Juergen proposed a new directory structure for
release packs than what we have now which is essentially:

/stable/VERSION/<en-US items>
/localized/<lang abbreviation>/VERSION/<lang items>

there are some other areas in SF as well and I don't know if they're still
being used

Could we restart the discussion, or just again send the proposed structure,
on what the "ideal" structure would look like so we could get to work on
modifying the download scripts? Thanks.


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"As a child my family's menu consisted of two choices:
    take it or leave it. "
                                   -- Buddy Hackett

--f46d0430896e62923604c7f3db71--