Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80818D99D for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 04:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86339 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2012 04:08:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86139 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2012 04:08:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86109 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2012 04:08:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 04:08:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 04:08:45 +0000 Received: by bkcik5 with SMTP id ik5so2816897bkc.6 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:08:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=ZGICg+OZev/0nQHLfmuZAFi5G+WhfFXCfu44RTcpE5c=; b=RF9sw8dUhonkkhEVgA8QOZ0879BpKOgWLrwP7TQJ9ZJnl8N6rzVV1KiOkQekF202cn lJ2ZVlkHdw7WWSFAQmMEeYP8ofqkPbQlcs/PnQ7QFV2p97I7cqqGOw/HYlf7fvFcCX6U EFjbGqreW4J0I7RwPND5OjRoTbIwsoBPrNwGd63glcYyeO0QPilkMQ4e9eINVn4jDmkS a3ffhGXIwUeKDElA8WaM+Ub6tkZ8iAbQQOped/EohxtfuQyX+sPmtEYE/w8ifefbjBcR ITQeACpLVgso+fSQvAP8qUJqv1a6vJmWEMy1iWoxJD0+cOZEAmagcDs+miLpAdDJ0tys npdw== Received: by 10.205.134.137 with SMTP id ic9mr6382257bkc.57.1343794105226; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.29] (e177193005.adsl.alicedsl.de. [85.177.193.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hg13sm892855bkc.7.2012.07.31.21.08.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 06:08:23 +0200 From: "=?utf-8?Q?J=C3=BCrgen_Schmidt?=" To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Developer ID for digitally signing Apple OSX releases? X-Mailer: sparrow 1.3.1 (build 507.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5018abb7_7c83e458_35d3" --5018abb7_7c83e458_35d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 1. August 2012 um 02:41 schrieb Rob Weir: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > > With the release of OSX Mountain Lion and its new Gatekeeper feature I > > wanted to ask if any thought had been given by the community of applying to > > Apple for a Developer ID. My limited understanding is that by signing the > > installation files with the Developer ID it automatically unlocks the > > gatekeeper and allows the application to run. Otherwise there is a short > > process that one must go through to change the security settings for the > > application allowing it to open. > > > > > We'd like to do code signing, not only for Mac but for Windows as > well. Signed installers are the new normal and are expected by > browser, anti-virus scanners and increasingly by operating systems. > > Although we have volunteers willing to do the build integration work, > and funds available for acquiring certificates, we've been told that > individual Apache projects may not do their own signing. The Apache > Infrastructure team is trying to figure out some way that this can be > done centrally. But no estimate for when this will happen. > exactly and at the moment we can only wait, I have no idea how we can help further at the moment. Any ideas are welcome. In the meantime we should add a note about the new Gatekeeper of Mountain Lion. It's a one time ctrl-click or opening via the context menu. After that you can run it as normal without any further dialog from the system. I tried it out and forget to take screenshot to document it. Juergen > > Regards, > > -Rob > > > Based on a question in the user mailing list I am adding a link to the > > Release Notes in the known problems section on how to make the required > > change. > > > > Regards > > Keith > > > > > --5018abb7_7c83e458_35d3--