Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA794DF97 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71815 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2012 14:02:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71747 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2012 14:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71739 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2012 14:02:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:02:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.126.186] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:02:20 +0000 Received: from kulungile.erack.de (f054049070.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.54.49.70]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LjtbV-1TcOpa47VB-00cPrW; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:02:00 +0200 Received: from erack by kulungile.erack.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1T5Gw2-00045i-UY for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:01:59 +0200 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:01:58 +0200 From: Eike Rathke To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: request for enchancement of the define name function in calc Message-ID: <20120825140158.GA14701@kulungile.erack.de> Mail-Followup-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org References: <50222A90.5040105@t-online.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Nickname: erAck User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:4nV814s5g9xpmgDID+jlNSQ3teH0QeJPPPOOg70h+zI HtwT9wMcpHqMKH1F3MdUrmod0qXIrq+/aXp8vV9sFyX/EQmYKx BV7vxhJ9OghjXBqSoVpl1fsFaOLk9B05fwQDv4lZQCOSqup0V2 AnyRoQPtwml8jAea9HkEFC5aOsmc6uRDWOONyY6Swf/OfyfcEo cWKBu8tbFe6doVqJ42fccJisUis/I/UJS03a52RwmtVILOhPr+ 11morUVf2xAtQF2ThgVP7WB1BESq/2lWUN0zwOE2JdANF0kZx5 vVvQxtJdzICKCy1yrfkqKCEiYGKF78o+Ra8emwTtwO2VQg0CUj 75508jJNics+jJyhykeEEgtJFs965WOx60tuJodES --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jianyuan, On Friday, 2012-08-10 16:55:20 +0800, Jianyuan Li wrote: > Below is my clarification for issue > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D119565. Comment is also a= dded > in Bugzilla. See my comment in https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D119565#c9 Eike --=20 PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlA42tYACgkQFbLmO4lpmVr70gCfeoY57gKp0o8a+e7vh+rYIJzJ oNUAoKgNQ91Ne80MpOsVAK7Ntyu2sEEa =yIKP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--