Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 009CBD29C for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67300 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2012 16:11:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67221 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2012 16:11:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67181 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2012 16:11:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:11:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.100] (HELO nm30.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:10:25 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.68] by nm30.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Aug 2012 16:10:04 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.11] by tm8.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Aug 2012 16:09:04 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1011.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Aug 2012 16:09:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 934712.73341.bm@omp1011.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 29824 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Aug 2012 16:09:04 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1343837344; bh=q+1QC/8PB7+padpW2xb3fF4iXQjjDge9kfbpAZysNos=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vmOkT7BI6xL07QX6c6vMJ8SmphJeczdRZyZgVC1QsDQ6e4mbyDjOd1e5SJFFzQa5lEWAnie8sUhrcqWiH6XW0j6FHeDzNnAMK8NrwcX8Sbfm8EOsrY2+lNz89e2ISl4Cn+t9t5ONksT98NoZ5+domY0242BW/7ICuIlf2Qde6tM= X-YMail-OSG: lY8WOqkVM1l6OUPIS8NZoJsq8l37p3VHFIZ0.opDT0DJSxE 6PxR.duWEWiLItl982lLPi0ZvdtZfXMBRA7jI5QLuam3H272W2Qd3wX3Gpg3 i6vod0mqVVDNBzI5Upb242OC.5izJ9vc53Re0etU3oURsEFEjkdISNAGYNjI DRn.BH4rgn5KyctNM2gWOml5fY3iqGAw1jaOpEy5BCzp27WCAJehyLQbSwg6 lf9K_5e6ckIh55neDop_FeLToICNBTL7WCmerz_aRRpit_.svSw_naSw2I8t JcnZMrwve1I42ZwRIcdMinrc_Sr.Lgqg4zXlT2AU3JD92Qufgx1ZkMyNDx2D 9uWU7a0b95zoGf3m1gx2ddGI8r5Hv0XpKKmtmzZsLzOmpQ94i.noddu2ukDX p_2FhxxCkORpGYTmbdQ01J8HKlkRoAlJjrRcITNw9sgVdXKVYuDvQk.6.fX2 8D5iMhLvS15LYsdH1r09CpnJ6AL7vbEBs1_VPumufBHEGZ.e_UzdHV5BCqlf Lwkw4l5p9stw3uUqN7CSOsCvo2YdXyRxukqe0Sw-- Received: from [200.118.157.7] by web113511.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 09:09:04 PDT X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233 References: <1343768684.4294.4.camel@sybil-gnome> Message-ID: <1343837344.86302.YahooMailNeo@web113511.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:09:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Pedro Giffuni Reply-To: Pedro Giffuni Subject: Re: What to say in AOO 3.4.1 release announcement about the ports? (BSD, Solaris, OS/2)? To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2064429303-804098788-1343837344=:86302" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --2064429303-804098788-1343837344=:86302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kay;=0A=0AI did some basic update to the FreeBSD porting site sometime a= go:=0A=0Ahttp://www.openoffice.org/porting/freebsd/=A0=0A=0A=0AThe site doe= sn't seem linked from the top-level porting site though.=0A=0AI would prefe= r to spend my time on the code rather than on the release=0Aannouncement, h= owever feel free to mention explicitly the FreeBSD port.=0AJust to make it = clear: we still have some cleanup to do but the port is=0Afully operational= and FreeBSD users are fully aware that it's available=0Aon FreeBSD release= s.=0A=0APedro.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A>________________________________=0A> From: Ka= y Schenk =0A>To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org =0A>Sen= t: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 10:47 AM=0A>Subject: Re: What to say in AOO 3.= 4.1 release announcement about the ports? (BSD, Solaris, OS/2)?=0A> =0A>On = Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:04 PM, drew wrote:=0A>=0A>> O= n Tue, 2012-07-31 at 14:36 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:=0A>> > I'm drafting the 3= .4.1 release announcement blog post.=A0 I have a=0A>> > bullet list where I= highlight what is in 3.4.1.=A0 I list what platforms=0A>> > are supported,= mention the Windows 8 compatibility improvements,=A0 and=0A>> > then follo= w with this bullet item:=0A>> >=0A>> > "Community members are also working = on BSD, Solaris and OS/2 ports,=0A>> > with plans to release these outside = of Apache."=0A>> >=0A>>=0A>> Howdy Rob,=0A>>=0A>> > Is this accurate and wo= rth saying?=0A>>=0A>> Yes IIRC and yes IMO.=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>> > Would it = make sense to also=0A>> > include links for each of these ports, where the = reader can go for=0A>> > more information?=0A>>=0A>> I would think a better= return if instead of putting direct links for=0A>> each, create a fixed ad= dress (wiki page?) for 'other ports' (or more=0A>> appropriate for a title)= .=0A>>=0A>=0A>Hi Drew--=0A>=0A>We have a page -- actually a former "project= " at --=0A>=0A>http://www.openoffice.org/porting/=0A>=0A>that needs a LOT o= f cleanup.=0A>=0A>Any volunteers to take the lead on cleaning this up and j= ust highlighting=0A>what we're dealing with now? FreeBSD, OS/2, and Solaris= ?=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>> Link to that from the announcement/blog and would make t= hat a precedent=0A>> for future announcements.=0A>>=0A>> >=0A>> > Although = these are not Apache releases, they are part of the close=0A>> > ecosystem,= with developers working directly in our project to support=0A>> > these po= rts.=A0 So I think there is some logic to mentioning them in the=0A>> > rel= ease announcement.=A0 But work that happens entirely outside of the=0A>> > = project, like portable applications versions, would not get a mention.=0A>>= =0A>> I would disagree, somewhat, in that personal preference would be to= =0A>> include the 2 or 3 portable 'wrapper' distributors as this has seemed= to=0A>> be of interest to quite a few folks in the past.=0A>>=0A>> Just my= .02=0A>>=0A>> //drew=0A>> >=0A>> > Does this seem fair and appropriate?=0A= >> >=0A>> > If we agree to do this, I'll need a link for each of BSD, Solar= is and=0A>> > OS/2, for more information.=0A>> >=0A>> > The alternative wou= ld be to not mention the ports at all.=0A>> >=0A>> > Regards,=0A>> >=0A>> >= -Rob=0A>> >=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>=0A>=0A>-- =0A>-------------------= ---------------------------------------------------------------------=0A>Mz= K=0A>=0A>"I'm just a normal jerk who happens to make music.=0A>As long as m= y brain and fingers work, I'm cool."=0A>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Eddie Van Halen=0A>=0A>=0A> --2064429303-804098788-1343837344=:86302--