From ooo-dev-return-23937-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Aug 2 10:59:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27900D009 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92916 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2012 10:59:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92715 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2012 10:59:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92693 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2012 10:59:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:59:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:59:03 +0000 Received: by bkcik5 with SMTP id ik5so3363897bkc.6 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 03:58:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KTyFdeZxnApEqtyVNpbh/Pmius6lSl7jlYVE9J4oHy0=; b=Aa9tFmzTZuqFU+45GJo8G5K3W14KoT1NLEXG7tEIdQ8Io5PPx/Gc6xlKq17S2xzJL3 fuELqhBQnXfsyiLq/EEx+Gz6Igw0OFAZWgjmPrfyh+fNYbFmglIdyT8rhS2FoX2+VuJw /okeol8ZNq6o2iYTY5MEgrPAiaYChg4pPNEYmTJWkgDliSM2ikZkfEfJgll0B5UFgcMV qkpyWfEGQVpKmEA3HSIlSdGPUy4GMRqCVRXuO7ov3V8piqRHy/An+wLetkHA5dE3Hq3M QAUbv6y0smEcwxSKwWYiZ5WgNbnoTY0bxohg8FwIZ9BNOz8ZwkzrHHkCKtdqJijhUN98 YMug== Received: by 10.204.155.66 with SMTP id r2mr8058387bkw.131.1343905122903; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 03:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.155.131.47] (deibp9eh1--blueice2n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t23sm3158212bks.4.2012.08.02.03.58.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Aug 2012 03:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <501A5D60.10202@googlemail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 12:58:40 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: potential release blocker References: <501A4545.8040801@googlemail.com> <2C259A3D-F6DB-4471-B1E4-BB2B9A9AB23D@comcast.net> <501A5AA3.7000801@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <501A5AA3.7000801@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 8/2/12 12:46 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 8/2/12 12:24 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> On Aug 2, 2012, at 2:15 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> imacat found a problem with the base application icon on windows. >>> >>> I can verify this issue with the latest version based on r1367911 when I >>> do a clean fresh installation, no upgrade. If you run an upgrade >>> installation you don't see this problem and the icon is ok. >> >> You have the answer to the question I asked imacat just now. >> >> BTW - did you notice that the Draw icon was also missing in her screenshot? > > no, I haven't noticed this, I was focused on the base icon ;-) and I know why I haven't noticed it, I have checked it again on my Windows machine and the only icon that is missing is that from Base ;-) I hate such problems... Are we sure that it worked with AOO 3.4? Well I am a Mac user and when I work on windows I don't use the Start Menu. Juergen > > The problem is that the icon seems to be there. When you right-click on > the entry and view the properties you will see the correct icon. > > Any ideas are welcome > > Juergen > >> >>> >>> I have currently no idea what's going wrong here and investigating in >>> the problem. I am not aware of any changes in this area and maybe it's a >>> build problem only. >>> >>> I think we should continue testing of the version and I will keep you >>> informed. >> >> Thanks for all your very hard work! >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> >>> Juergen >> >