incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Madden <gomadtr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated
Date Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:03:11 GMT
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Greg Madden <gomadtroll@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Wolf Halton <wolf.halton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sounds like it might not take too much effort to get it to work in Ubuntu.
>>
>> Wolf Halton
>> http://sourcefreedom.com
>> Apache developer:
>> wolfhalton@apache.org
>> On Aug 24, 2012 4:37 PM, "Marcelo Santana" <msantana@cnen.gov.br> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:45:38 +0800, imacat <imacat@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> >     Hmm... in that case, shouldn't these package files work on
>>> > Squeeze, too?  Why is Wheezy?  Wheezy is not released yet.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure, but probably yes because there is no package dependency
>>> which prevent it to be installed on the squeeze. But I've not tested
>>> yet.
>
> I am a Debian user. I switched to AOO a while back because of a
> regression in LO that affects my work. I have been using the dev
> builds, works great....thanks.
>
> I am testing Wheezy in a VM , tried the sourceforge Debian repo's. The
> issue I am seeing is Debian still uses 'openoffice'  in their package
> management systems. Trying to find/install  openoffice results in
> links to libreoffice.

My mistake, wrong sources.list entry.

>
> While this is probable an issue to discuss with Debian, I am wondering
> how this repo is working for others.  What is the package name to
> install AOO ?

I now see it is openoffice.org3.

Debian, Wheezy , does use 'openoffice.org though.

-- 
Peace

Greg Madden

Mime
View raw message