incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What to say in AOO 3.4.1 release announcement about the ports? (BSD, Solaris, OS/2)?
Date Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:16:22 GMT
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:57 AM, drew jensen <drewjensen.inbox@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 08:47 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:04 PM, drew <drew@baseanswers.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 14:36 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> > > > I'm drafting the 3.4.1 release announcement blog post.  I have a
> > > > bullet list where I highlight what is in 3.4.1.  I list what
> platforms
> > > > are supported, mention the Windows 8 compatibility improvements,  and
> > > > then follow with this bullet item:
> > > >
> > > > "Community members are also working on BSD, Solaris and OS/2 ports,
> > > > with plans to release these outside of Apache."
> > > >
> > >
> > > Howdy Rob,
> > >
> > > > Is this accurate and worth saying?
> > >
> > > Yes IIRC and yes IMO.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Would it make sense to also
> > > > include links for each of these ports, where the reader can go for
> > > > more information?
> > >
> > > I would think a better return if instead of putting direct links for
> > > each, create a fixed address (wiki page?) for 'other ports' (or more
> > > appropriate for a title).
> > >
> >
> > Hi Drew--
> >
> > We have a page -- actually a former "project" at --
> >
> >  http://www.openoffice.org/porting/
> >
> > that needs a LOT of cleanup.
> >
> > Any volunteers to take the lead on cleaning this up and just highlighting
> > what we're dealing with now? FreeBSD, OS/2, and Solaris?
>
> Hi Kay,
>
> Yes, I'll work on that page today and ping the list when it is in
> stagging.
>
> //drew
>

SUPER! :)


>
> >
> >
> >
> > > Link to that from the announcement/blog and would make that a precedent
> > > for future announcements.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Although these are not Apache releases, they are part of the close
> > > > ecosystem, with developers working directly in our project to support
> > > > these ports.  So I think there is some logic to mentioning them in
> the
> > > > release announcement.  But work that happens entirely outside of the
> > > > project, like portable applications versions, would not get a
> mention.
> > >
> > > I would disagree, somewhat, in that personal preference would be to
> > > include the 2 or 3 portable 'wrapper' distributors as this has seemed
> to
> > > be of interest to quite a few folks in the past.
> > >
> > > Just my .02
> > >
> > > //drew
> > > >
> > > > Does this seem fair and appropriate?
> > > >
> > > > If we agree to do this, I'll need a link for each of BSD, Solaris and
> > > > OS/2, for more information.
> > > >
> > > > The alternative would be to not mention the ports at all.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > -Rob
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"I'm just a normal jerk who happens to make music.
 As long as my brain and fingers work, I'm cool."
                              -- Eddie Van Halen

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message