incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: proposed new directory structure for future releases
Date Sun, 26 Aug 2012 21:43:04 GMT
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:

>
> On Aug 26, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.mail@wtnet.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 08/26/2012 02:26 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Kay Schenk<kay.schenk@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 08/25/2012 01:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 23/08/2012 22:06, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also IMHO no need to separate between the languages.
> >>>>>> Furthermore, when you have to check for a potential error, then
you
> you
> >>>>>> just need to verify this in a single directory and not more.
> >>>>>> /stable/VERSION/<all and every install file>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The rest is OK, but removing even the languages subdirectories is
> >>>>> probably too much: we already have 20 languages and they could
> >>>>> theoretically reach 100+, so it would make sense to preserve the
> >>>>> individual subdirectories "en-US", "de", "it" and so on.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>    Andrea.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 with Andrea on this one. We should leave the languages in separate
> >>>> directories. And, if folks do "browsing" on SourceForge instead of
> using
> >>>> our
> >>>> download logic, this will make things easier for that purpose as well.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> It also makes it easier if someone wants to burn a CD for just a
> >>> single language.
> >>>
> >>
> >> OK, so our most recent opinion is the following:
> >>
> >> /stable/VERSION/<lang_id>/...
> >>
> >> Anyone else with different suggestions?
> >>
> >> Marcus
> >>
> >>
> > I think we were going to drop "stable" and just go with something like
> >
> > /ooo/<VERSION>/source
> > /ooo/<VERSION>/bin/<LANG>/
> > /ooo/<VERSION>/bin/SDK/
> >
> > ...and there was some further discussion on the use of "bin".
> >
> > At any rate, since we only distribute "stable", this is redundant, so we
> > don't need it, and shouldn't have it.
> >
> > Really I like the idea of "bin" to distinguish from source. As long as
> most
> > people continue to download from www.openoffice.org, it is certainly
> not a
> > problem. But, maybe a bit more discussion on this aspect.
>
> s/bin/binaries/
>
>
> /ooo/<VERSION>/source
> /ooo/<VERSION>/binaries/<LANG>/
> /ooo/<VERSION>/binaries/SDK/
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>

yes, that would definitely solve the "bin" double meaning...I thought of
this but I'm happy you suggested it...

OK, can we just go with this new naming scheme, so we can get to work on it?




>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > MzK
> >
> > "As a child my family's menu consisted of two choices:
> >    take it or leave it. "
> >                                   -- Buddy Hackett
>
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"As a child my family's menu consisted of two choices:
    take it or leave it. "
                                   -- Buddy Hackett

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message