incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: update on the current status ...
Date Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:57:23 GMT
Am 08/23/2012 10:20 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
> Am 08/23/2012 06:07 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 23.08.2012 17:34, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>> On 23.08.2012 17:06, Andreas Säger wrote:
>>>> Am 23.08.2012 15:52, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> as the so called release manager I would like to give an update
>>>>> where we
>>>>> are with the release and the final release preparation.
>>>>>
>>>>> You all know we passed the PPMC and IPMC vote successful, the first
>>>>> important step towards our release.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The download page suggests:
>>>>>
>>>>> Download Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
>>>>>
>>>>> Click to start downloading the most recent version for Linux Debian
>>>>> 64-bit (DEB) and Deutsch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> which is correct.
>>>>
>>>> When I follow the suggestion I get a file
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Linux_x86_install-deb_de.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> which is not correct. It does not install a runnable program
>>>>> $ /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice
>>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice: 84:
>>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice:
>>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/pagein: not found
>>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice: 1:
>>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice:
>>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/bin/javaldx: not
>>>>> found
>>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice: 120:
>>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice:
>>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: not found
>>>
>>> I get the same error message (on Ubuntu 12.04 64bit) but it is
>>> misleading. The
>>> files exist (I checked), but they do not run. So, only one problem to
>>> solve:
>>> fix detection of correct Linux platform.
>>>
>>
>> Together with Andre and Jürgen I had made a change to the download
>> script.
>> Please try again.
>
> Thanks for diving in and fixing.
>
> I'm sure that the now commented code part is in since, hm, ever. Were
> there also problems in the past? Does someone remember?
>
> Seems to be a case to investigate on the weekend when I've more spare time.

I've looked into the code and the part you have commented out.

It is logical that the DL script return always a 32-bit file because of 
the last "else" clause which is working as a fall-back regardless what 
was set in the "if" statements some line before.

However, I've no clue how that last "else" came in. So, I guess it was 
already online with AOO 3.4.0 or maybe longer. But nobody has noticed 
the error before? Hm, strange. I'm a bit puzzled.

So, thanks again for the fix.

Marcus

Mime
View raw message