incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: update on the current status ...
Date Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:20:04 GMT
Am 08/23/2012 06:07 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
> Hi,
>
> On 23.08.2012 17:34, Andre Fischer wrote:
>> On 23.08.2012 17:06, Andreas Säger wrote:
>>> Am 23.08.2012 15:52, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> as the so called release manager I would like to give an update
>>>> where we
>>>> are with the release and the final release preparation.
>>>>
>>>> You all know we passed the PPMC and IPMC vote successful, the first
>>>> important step towards our release.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The download page suggests:
>>>>
>>>> Download Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
>>>>
>>>> Click to start downloading the most recent version for Linux Debian
>>>> 64-bit (DEB) and Deutsch.
>>>
>>>
>>> which is correct.
>>>
>>> When I follow the suggestion I get a file
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Linux_x86_install-deb_de.tar.gz
>>>
>>> which is not correct. It does not install a runnable program
>>>> $ /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice
>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice: 84:
>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice:
>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/program/pagein: not found
>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice: 1:
>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice:
>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/bin/javaldx: not
>>>> found
>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice: 120:
>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice:
>>>> /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin: not found
>>
>> I get the same error message (on Ubuntu 12.04 64bit) but it is
>> misleading. The
>> files exist (I checked), but they do not run. So, only one problem to
>> solve:
>> fix detection of correct Linux platform.
>>
>
> Together with Andre and Jürgen I had made a change to the download script.
> Please try again.

Thanks for diving in and fixing.

I'm sure that the now commented code part is in since, hm, ever. Were 
there also problems in the past? Does someone remember?

Seems to be a case to investigate on the weekend when I've more spare time.

Marcus


Mime
View raw message