incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
Date Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:07:22 GMT
Which better agrees with written policy anyway- the sigs
are part of the release package to be voted on and voted on
by the PMC, so even tho it constitutes individual sigs
those sigs (well at least the RM's sig) are PMC-approved.




----- Original Message -----
> From: Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 1:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
> 
> On Aug 27, 2012 9:57 AM, "Jim Jagielski" <jim@jagunet.com> 
> wrote:
>> ...
>>  But recall in all this that even when the PMC releases code, it is
>>  signed by the individual RM, and not by the PMC itself.
> 
> Apache Subversion releases tend to have a half-dozen signatures. Thus, I'd
> say they are signed by the PMC. For example:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/subversion/subversion-1.7.6.tar.bz2.asc
> 
> Cheers,
> -g
> 

Mime
View raw message