Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51187CCFE for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99431 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2012 22:17:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 99353 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2012 22:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 99345 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2012 22:17:29 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:17:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:17:29 +0000 Received: by wibhm11 with SMTP id hm11so1744079wib.0 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:17:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.100.131 with SMTP id ey3mr781321wib.15.1343341047821; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:17:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.172.131 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:17:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1343340590.11815.YahooMailClassic@web113518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <5010F93D.5020209@googlemail.com> <1343340590.11815.YahooMailClassic@web113518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:17:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RELEAASE][3.4.1]: propose the next build for 3.4.1 based on revision 1364583 From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello guys; > Just wondering .. > Can I chop the Python-2.6.1 src tarball now? I left it around to make > sure I don't break anything but it shouldn't be needed in trunk anymore. The AOO 3.4.0 source tarballs rely on the trunk's ext-src, right? So maybe we should wait for AOO 3.4.1 to be officially released first. That way we can always point developers to a working source distribution. -Rob > Pedro. > > --- Gio 26/7/12, J=C3=BCrgen Schmidt ha scri= tto: > > > not with the Hunspell update but indirectly by the integration of the > new download mechanism. The file is new on the branch and included > changes for these version updates that were already done on the trunk. > Important for me to understand where it comes from to avoid such things > in the future ... > > Thanks Ariel for detecting it, I would probably have stumbled over it > when I would have tested the source release package which is on my plan > for this week. > > Juergen > >> >> I am currently building a new MacOS and Windows version based on >> revision 1365887 >> >> @Ariel: can you please build the Linux versions based on this revision >> >> Juergen >> >