Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1982DDCC for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39035 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2012 18:05:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38954 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2012 18:05:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38946 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2012 18:05:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:05:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of acolorado@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:05:11 +0000 Received: by qcad10 with SMTP id d10so3674810qca.6 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 11:04:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lKVztbKTxDILYvIynNGcydT/2FtKxfe67waoAQmGoXA=; b=aQU9CpWWhbGSo1v7YCU5ToAMwnOHPeLmRBljtW6OyWJIvCB/QWcBc1i6U7AGOS3FTo vzoKIdmnlDL5Ev4HLTdGOES6TYVjZMEdmBN8143TV6yUntcwvtku/WCjfntMsmFlUQ41 Ol7Dp8KiMdYdqnuD/wAyZK/MKZ6RtFEDH3Z9Wh8PpNgv62AITlhJMQXxPyc4zDn4ALJN ybqSG8wGF2hIlsEPSe0wdWw4e7ktSzpeYbi+9g1Ar+RsHCudiyZTnot+48r/KcMEXaWx dUFTR4bIdI5Dh/wfm3PyYw8rLNQJgdIzw/pZhbl62V4m6KVgU9YeOXS5Z16OZusKmTBw YvpA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.105.205 with SMTP id u13mr14104304qco.9.1341511490422; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 11:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: acolorado@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.46.11 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 11:04:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 13:04:50 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mEJ3Ruzfh47maY12lXWUgV4dTfI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Java From: Alexandro Colorado To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022158c0f0dd9464604c418fbaf X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0022158c0f0dd9464604c418fbaf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > JavaFX has a very restrictive licencse and is pretty heavy > > JavaFX is also becoming open source. > > "At JavaOne 2011, Oracle Corporation announced that JavaFX 2.0 would > become open source[17]. Since December 2011, Oracle began to open > source the JavaFX code under the GPL+linking exception" > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaFX > > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/openjfx/ > > I wish people would stop the anti-Java FUD... but the misinformation > is rampant and is continuously being spread... like in the above > example. > > FC > This is not missinformation, like you mentioned, it has only been anounced to be GPL about 6 months ago, GPL is not compatible with Apache license. Also is slower than C/C++, and is also true that most people actually want to take Java dependencies off the platform. A good example is the OOo4Kids and OOoLight fork which kicked Java out of the platform tom the very early version. --0022158c0f0dd9464604c418fbaf--