Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C8BFDBBA for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26769 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2012 07:21:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26675 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2012 07:21:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26658 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2012 07:21:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:21:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.175] (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:21:05 +0000 Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5so7135418lbo.6 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:20:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3yfMX9G2NaMZjOz7MQMbJ5Lv9+ftslxkgzGpC7vr7Bg=; b=dQDrVIh1RADqGFR0NF115r9ynWo96sgkfejmbYIo227sbyxCsmbgC+lWyjifd7Fxrn ERoHKoT8JfvJTsar1A6yQKX74hQeW7H7QCZ3yzxrYNx0rfX5veNgSj6elBsotPqY9H5l 4wYwHHrw9NhbgIPJzS/9CEhiGls+AKwnOI8H1MqTsIremiqd5ynwFmslAPNN3b55dJuk uwFrUBmkR1jRVfz2jy52S8xtn1uERGzC7Lwj2SUdAeyJvDIODSJt34H/sWLEJz34WSaB L+k7nShb92tblaY5rjxVHoXlBjMuv0MNoXXb+sbb57cf24XO23o0UMxmwoZEafwtfNjZ 8g7w== Received: by 10.112.83.198 with SMTP id s6mr7070730lby.76.1343028044999; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:20:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.155.131.47] (deibp9eh1--blueice2n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h9sm2643338lbi.9.2012.07.23.00.20.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:20:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <500CFB58.9070803@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:20:56 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBTY2htaWR0?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [QA REPORT] After long-running GUI testing, memory leak is much less than before. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 7/23/12 5:11 AM, Linyi Li wrote: > Hi all, > > Last week I did some long-running GUI testing on AOO 3.4, build r1359641, > using Java on my ubuntu10.04. > > > - Here is my scenario: > > 1. Create new Text Document/Spreadsheet/Presentation/Drawing. > 2. Input some simple text in it. > 3. Save and then reopen it. > 4. Repeat the above steps. > > > - Here is the long-running report. > > 471 iterations, 61 hours, memory changed from 121168 KB to 809644 KB,+1462KB > per iteration. > > Comparing with the long-running test report on June 8[1], memory leak is > half of that time. > > Thanks to those who contributed to this. Hope memory leak will be less and > less. thanks for the report and the good news, it's promising for the future Juergen > > [1] > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Zhe Liu wrote: > >> Unfortunately,I lost Mac data and forget the iteration count. >> Fortunately, I also did the same test on Ubuntu: >> 361 iterations, 48hours, memory changed from 122644KB to 1133668KB, >> +2800KB per iteration. >>