Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCC8FDECC for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 03:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52759 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2012 03:15:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52553 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2012 03:15:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52525 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2012 03:15:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 03:15:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.86.89.69] (HELO elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.69) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 03:14:55 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=s7G3a7v3P0hTRHtu3p993U7+mT3wo8oa3izU+gY8dI5hGV8kO6lAaWV++l1vQVwH; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Antivirus-Status:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from user-1120lhj.dsl.mindspring.com ([66.32.86.51] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1SrKig-0007FT-5F for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:14:34 -0400 Message-ID: <50062A26.5040401@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 22:14:46 -0500 From: Peter Brawley Reply-To: peter.brawley@earthlink.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AOO-LibreOffice comparison? References: <5005B448.7020605@earthlink.net> <5005FE0C.5020607@earthlink.net> <50061405.1020100@earthlink.net> <1342576870.40931.YahooMailNeo@web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <50061B50.3070308@earthlink.net> <1342580618.79924.YahooMailNeo@web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1342580618.79924.YahooMailNeo@web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120717-1, 07/17/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ELNK-Trace: d43912bea8fab4cdea7981bfee43b39d74bf435c0eb9d4786d8d458a35b7643053872172d408e270df7ea8291aa812b3350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.32.86.51 On 2012-07-17 10:03 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > ________________________________ > ... >> On 2012-07-17 9:01 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > ... >>> Most of us simply don't run LibreOffice >> That seems unfortunate, why wouldn't AOO developers want to keep up to >> date with their main competition? > > "Competition" among free software is somewhat of a non-concept. I work mainly with MySQL. Competition has always been a concept. > Technically, > MS-office is also our competitor. Sure. > >> Yes obviously that's a possibility. I was hoping for a shortcut, and for >> info that transcends my experience. Evidently it's not going to happen here. >> > If it serves your purpose, the SVG drawing feature seems to be well > received by our users but in general in AOO we are focusing more on making > the product really stable and well behaved on all supported platforms rather > than on adding new features. Thanks. PB ----- > > best regards, > > Pedro. > >