Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4157ADFC2 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14873 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2012 20:19:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14797 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2012 20:19:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14789 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2012 20:19:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:19:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de designates 213.209.103.15 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.209.103.15] (HELO smtp4.wtnet.de) (213.209.103.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:19:13 +0000 X-WT-Originating-IP: 84.46.110.107 Received: from f9.linux (pop8-1636.catv.wtnet.de [84.46.110.107]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp4.wtnet.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6GKKcBY024929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:20:43 +0200 Message-ID: <50047728.8050308@wtnet.de> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:18:48 +0200 From: "Marcus (OOo)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Are you ready to graduate? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 07/16/2012 08:57 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> as a mentor of this project it is my impression that this podling is >> ready to graduate. >> >> This is surely a project with much heat in it; but I also think it is >> stable. The project made a release and constantly voted in new >> committers/ppmc members. It is active and has proven that it can make >> decisions by discussions. >> >> As mentors we have stepped into many discussions and told what we >> think. But now it seems to me there is nothing we can bring to you. >> The culture here is settled. You guys know whom to ask and where to go >> if problems occur. >> >> Looking at this: >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html >> it seems everything is done. >> >> My questions to you all as a project: >> >> Do you feel ready to graduate? >> Are you able to vote a chair? >> Do you think your project is ready? >> >> If you can answer all the questions above with "yes" I would love to >> see graduation actions/discussions as mentioned here: >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html >> > > We discussed this in a thread a month or so ago. I think the answer > was yes, but with two concerns on the timing: > > 1) There was some category-b per-requisite components that we had in > SVN. At least one project member thought this needed to be done > before graduation. The plan was to move them to Apache Extras. But > doing so would break the build in AOO 3.4 release. So we agreed to > fix this in AOO 3.4.1. > > 2) Some of us wanted to avoid the distraction of a graduation vote at > the same time as the 3.4.1 release, a time when we're really > heads-down on the release end game.. Especially if this would lead to > disruptive naming changes that would have an impact on product UI > and/or release communications due to changing URL's and email > addresses, etc. > > So the discussion at that time was to push for AOO 3.4.1 release by > end of July and then start the graduation proceedings. > > Of course, I'm not saying this is set in stone. But that was the > outcome of the prior discussion. I also think that this would interfer the last phase of creating and publishing 3.4.1 is not so good (even if graduation is of course a very positive event ;-) ). So +1 to wait a few weeks more when the 3.4.1 release is done and some dust has settled. Marcus