Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <1342163554.64644.YahooMailClassic@web113505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>
Reply-To: pfg@apache.org
Subject: Re: Next steps for Symphony and AOO
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAO6D2z+jtwRdURMpc0krTVgGXXH3O=bfrNFsy1bSsgknydr9AA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


--- Ven 13/7/12, Greg Madden ha scritto:
...

> I have been testing the Symphony deb packages. The 'properties' area
> is a nice feature, not compelling enough to re-base AOO on Symphony.
> AOO has progressed, new feaures that I use more than the 'properties
> area'.
>=20

thanks for the feedback.

> The drop down list for 'open document' on the initial screen
> with all apps is missing.=A0 'Tools>Openoffice,org>View>User
> Interface>Scaleing' is not included.
>=20
AFAICT, The symphony builds were not meant to be production
ready, just meant to show the basic features.

> I am not interested in losing features that I have
> incorporated in my
> work flow, for promises of a 'better whatever'
>=20
> Document fidelity has been outstanding in AOO , add Symphony
> feaures
> to AOO if appropriate, by user demand not from the top
> down.
>=20

I agree, we all want a better product and the challenge
is to preserve all the feature set with no regressions.

Pedro.