incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [QA REPORT] After long-running GUI testing, memory leak is much less than before.
Date Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:30:39 GMT
On 7/23/12 4:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/23/2012 12:20 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 7/23/12 5:11 AM, Linyi Li wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Last week I did some long-running GUI testing on AOO 3.4, build
>>> r1359641,
>>> using Java on my ubuntu10.04.
>>>
>>>
>>>     - Here is my scenario:
>>>
>>> 1. Create new Text Document/Spreadsheet/Presentation/Drawing.
>>> 2. Input some simple text in it.
>>> 3. Save and then reopen it.
>>> 4. Repeat the above steps.
>>>
>>>
>>>     - Here is the long-running report.
>>>
>>> 471 iterations, 61 hours, memory changed from 121168 KB to 809644
>>> KB,+1462KB
>>> per iteration.
>>>
>>> Comparing with the long-running test report on June 8[1], memory leak is
>>> half of that time.
>>>
>>> Thanks to those who contributed to this. Hope memory leak will be
>>> less and
>>> less.
>>
>> thanks for the report and the good news, it's promising for the future
>>
>> Juergen
> 
> Hi Linyi --
> 
> Yes, thanks indeed for this good news. I marked this issue as "critical"
> yesterday.
> 
> OK, maybe you can enlighten us. How would a "memory leak" get better
> exactly? Does this mean that AOO is doing something differently *now*,
> that is in the last few weeks, than it was when this was initially
> re-reported at the beginning of June?

it is not one memory leak, we have have many leaks in different places
in the code.
And with fixing one of these issues the meta issue "memory leak" becomes
better if you want ;-)

> 
> And, according to Dennis's notes on issue 11934:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119341
> 
> these kinds of problems have been around as early as version 1.1.
> 
> I didn't see any changes in the commit logs in the last few weeks that
> would have directly addressed this.
> 

fixes in other areas, I think this special one is not yet addressed

Juergen

> Your thoughts?
> 
> 
>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Zhe Liu <aliuzhe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Unfortunately,I lost  Mac data and forget the iteration count.
>>>> Fortunately, I also did the same test on Ubuntu:
>>>> 361 iterations,  48hours, memory changed from 122644KB to 1133668KB,
>>>> +2800KB per iteration.
>>>>
>>
> 


Mime
View raw message