Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99B2CC0D7 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73210 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2012 12:43:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73100 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2012 12:43:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73084 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2012 12:43:00 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:43:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vb0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:43:00 +0000 Received: by vbjk17 with SMTP id k17so345681vbj.7 for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 05:42:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.220.78 with SMTP id hx14mr1902680vcb.17.1339072979065; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 05:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.190.13 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 05:42:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FD01625.2020304@gmx.org> References: <4FD01625.2020304@gmx.org> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 08:42:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Moderation best practices & FAQ From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Peter Junge wrote: > Hi moderators, *, > > I have a couple of questions WRT the best practices of moderating AOO > mailing list. As I have found, the mailing lists FAQs > (ooo-dev-faq@incubator.apache.org) are yet non-existent, so the discussion > here should also be used to contribute FAQs. > General mailing list FAQ's are on the website here: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/mailing-lists.html#participation-guidelines Users who need basic FAQ's are probably not aware of how to request the FAQ's via the mailing list. A little bit on list moderation is here: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/ppmc-faqs.html#mailing-lists (The list of moderators could probably be updated) > My questions are: > > 1) Shall moderators contact senders who are not subscribed to a mailing list > an letting them know that they might not receive the answers to their > questions? Or, going one step further, pointing those senders on the list > archive, so they can look for replies there. > I don't do that. But maybe make this clearer wherever we point users to the lists? > I'm not doing this at the moment. If we would agree to do so, it would be > good to draft a reply template that every moderator can use. > > 2) Shall moderators contact senders who are disclosing their complete > contact information (e.g. telephone, address) that it will be exposed in > public before moderating the posting? > I do that sometimes, depending on context. For example, if someone just has an email signature that gives their name and phone number, I let that pass. But if they are clearly a confused user, or are a minor saying "I have a school paper due tomorrow. I need help, please call me at 123-456-7890", then I reject that note and contact them and point them to the support forums. In the end it is not our responsibility to prevent users from disclosing their private information. It is there responsibility. Another way to look at it is to consider Apache archive policy: http://www.apache.org/foundation/public-archives.html As you can see, basic contact information is not considered confidential. But things like social security numbers are. So if you see something that would be considered confidential per this policy, then I think it would be reasonable to catch this at moderation time if possible, > My proceeding is to let those messages through if the sender is disclosing > corporate contact information that one can find in directories or elsewhere. > If the sender is disclosing private information, I'm not letting the message > through but contact the person asking for an explicit allowance. > > 3) Should moderators report frequent spammers to Infra? > I have not seen frequent spammers. I do see the same spam message sent to many lists simultaneously. But I have not seen the same spam come days in a row. > IMHO it might make sense to improve spam filters. Is there any automated > process implemented? > > > FAQs that seem to be clear are: > > Q: Where can I find the Apache committer's mail FAQ: > A: http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#mail > > Q: Where do I find the "Moderator's and Administrator's Manual" to Apache's > mailing lists? > A: http://www.ezmlm.org/ > > Q: How do I recognize if a message on an AOO mailing list has been > moderated? > A: The header of an moderated email contains the item 'Delivered-To: > moderator for ooo-*@incubator.apache.org' > > More FAQ are certainly welcome. > These are good. From a moderator's perspective, maybe: How do I see who is subscribed to the list? How do I manually unsubscribe someone? In generally, the lists manage themselves. Moderator intervention is mainly needed in scenarios like this: User is unable or unwilling to unsubscribe themselves. They start posting many disruptive angry messages to the list demand to be removed. They won't listen to install instructions. Or they are unable to carry out these instructions. Maybe they are confused because of multiple email addresses or a forwarder. Maybe they share a PC with someone else who subscribed. Maybe the spam filters are preventing them from seeing the unsubscribe confirmation note, or are preventing ezmlm from receiving the unsubscribe note. We get something like this on rare occasions. In these cases the moderators can trigger an unsubscribe of the user. -Rob > Best regards, > Peter >