of the page says "Apache OpenOffice (incubating)". >> Ditto for the largest (and first) header on the page. >> >> Looking at the general list, it sounds like NIck's issue was that blog >> aggregators, such as used by Apache for generating content on the home >> page are not picking up on this. > > Hi, > > Maybe, I just read the incubator list also I think Nick is saying that > _any_ time the phrase Apache OpenOffice is used it must have the word > incubating included, not just in the title. > But that's not the policy. The policy is that it must be called out as incubating at first mention in the document. -Rob > > //drew >

Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 694179AAD for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99474 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2012 13:51:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 99394 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2012 13:51:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 99386 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2012 13:51:50 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:51:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:51:49 +0000 Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so1471181vbb.6 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 06:51:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.100.229 with SMTP id fb5mr2746204vdb.102.1340459508564; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 06:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.190.13 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 06:51:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1340459322.9534.49.camel@sybil-gnome> References:

<1340459322.9534.49.camel@sybil-gnome> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:51:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Must use the incubating qualifier From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:48 AM, drew wrote: > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 08:52 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Ross Gardler >> > wrote: >> >> It has been pointed out on the general list that AOO is not always us= ing >> >> the incubating qualifier. For example recent blog posts don't include= it. >> >> >> > >> > It is right there, first thing on the page, in a very large font, for >> > every blog post: =C2=A0"Apache OpenOffice (incubating)" >> > >> >> E.g, : =C2=A0https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/5_million_downloads_of_a= pache >> >> Note the of the page says "Apache OpenOffice (incubating)". >> Ditto for the largest (and first) header on the page. >> >> Looking at the general list, it sounds like NIck's issue was that blog >> aggregators, such as used by Apache for generating content on the home >> page are not picking up on this. > > Hi, > > Maybe, I just read the incubator list also I think Nick is saying that > _any_ time the phrase Apache OpenOffice is used it must have the word > incubating included, not just in the title. > But that's not the policy. The policy is that it must be called out as incubating at first mention in the document. -Rob > > //drew > > <snip> >