Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F17CC347 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12028 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2012 22:16:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11925 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2012 22:16:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11914 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2012 22:16:42 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:16:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:16:41 +0000 Received: by vcbfl15 with SMTP id fl15so2136670vcb.6 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:16:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.19.232 with SMTP id i8mr6737229vde.38.1338675400843; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.190.13 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:16:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: What to do with the Czech homepage? From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 http://www.openoffice.org/cs/ I don't read Czech, but I was going over the NL pages to verify download links, in preparation for when we enable the OOo 3.3 upgrades. You can get a good sense of the page via http://translate.google.com If any knows Czech, it would be good to confirm what follows: At the top of the page it says (per Google): "This is the site for developers. The portal for users visit http://www.OpenOffice.cz/" The rest of the page has links to extremely old versions, like OOo 2.2. This would be a security issue except these links appear to be broken. If you follow the link ot www.openoffice.cz, you see a site that claims (in its title) to be the "Official Portal of OpenOffice.org". Two clicks later and you have a page that does have links to the AOO 3.4 distribution files: http://www.openoffice.cz/stahnout/openoffice-org But the branding is wrong, there is no mention of the license, no links to the source, etc. The site is a nice looking site, but I don't think our site should be linking to something that claims to be the official download site. So my plan is to remove the link and update the www.openoffice.org/cs to link to the AOO 3.4 Czech files. Any concerns? -Rob