Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevingrignon.oo@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksoiOOuw4k7BHJ+3x6O-jri0qrDT5HG7Jfj+MUV-Dyua-RQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAP-ksoiVK0x2gPtSCex=69dzB9a1nUwwQUtxCryHLvSyrLFgOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMwm1vE1fL1X5fFCOD_JQmbXOnGW26RaT_TE6eNcuXbHznF89g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksoiOOuw4k7BHJ+3x6O-jri0qrDT5HG7Jfj+MUV-Dyua-RQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:46:46 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAO4+hqOC_ksBAByWRvLoO2bSMooLjKC=-3x7yM_rZEdptsDzXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Word cloud for ooo-dev post subjects
From: Kevin Grignon <kevingrignon.oo@gmail.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30563d2d21e33904c3944cc6

--20cf30563d2d21e33904c3944cc6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

KG01 - See comments inline.

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Donald Whytock <dwhytock@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~robweir/ooo-dev-cloud.png
> >>
> >> This looks at the top 1000 terms used in ooo-dev post subjects since
> >> this project moved to Apache in June 2011.  The only thing I removed
> >> was "Re:", since that would have dominated the cloud and is machine,
> >> not user written
> >>
>

KG01 - Great stuff Rob. These simple analytics are really interesting. *Would
you be open to harvesting and sharing the extracted post titles for both
ooo-dev and ooo-users and sending along to me*. The Python bit is
unfamiliar to me. The text files, like you did for the twitter feeds would
be great. Then I can go into wordle and tweak, using a variety of filters.
Also, I am exploring other analytic tools to parse the data. Thanks.


> >> In this particular cloud, I used all posts, including responses.  So
> >> if a term was used in a thread that had many responses, it would have
> >> additional weight in this chart.
> >>
> >> Technologies used:
> >>
> >> Python's mailbox API to extract the post titles.  Could have done this
> >> with any number of command line text tools as well, but it is trivial
> >> in Python as well:
> >>
> >> import mailbox
> >>
> >> box = mailbox.mbox(fileName)
> >>
> >> for message in box:
> >>     print message['Subject']
> >>
> >>
> >> Then I used Wordle.net to generate the graphic.
> >>
> >> Based on the reaction given to the previous word cloud, I know that
> >> some list subscribers are curious to see how often we write about
> >> LibreOffice.  So I'll help you find it in this graphic.  Look for the
> >> big "AOO", then under that see the "COMMIT".  Under COMMIT you can
> >> make out LIBREOFFICE, to the left of USERS.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >
> > Somehow not as stylish in this font.
> >
> > "Bug" is visible in this one.  No one tweets about bugs?
> >
>
> I think this is a user/developer difference.  Users talk in more
> direct terms, about how bugs impact them.    So very few mention a
> "bug".  But 18 mentions on Twitter of some form of
> crash/crashed/crashing.   On the ooo-dev list we call these "bugs" or
> "issues".  Users "lose all their work".  We "debug an exception".  The
> army "pacifies the village", etc.
>
> It is good to remember the difference in impact our work (good or bad)
> has on others, even though we use more clinical terms on this list.
>
> -Rob
>
>
> > Don
>

--20cf30563d2d21e33904c3944cc6--