Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 686A79598 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66934 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2012 21:54:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66882 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2012 21:54:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66872 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2012 21:54:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:54:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dwhytock@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:54:42 +0000 Received: by qcso7 with SMTP id o7so1431574qcs.6 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:54:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FOwVe4DtPq32ckWjrNhR+BHQvQXMZtUMdaevdhKq4OY=; b=br0NYmztr8Z4ciMdcueOR6uqN56OfQs1LqA5RZPMbShOx55Uu5jawlSQc7ONxWYbkA XdqNttgDMbs493wtn23lMACRKijd97bNa7Sq3WFPIY8f4n3cjTU12oHNPnnPK/77Hf43 JTW9F+D0PM+fP027NAqpgUD3KEwniImS8ENBt8t3egP5q+Oa5zIFIQefSGiKXcYS5sTF sjzQwUsdDQqTK+reSCJunEIdrgMyvJ/fQwznmGg5o2Md6b49CuSUc0zV7TlxDUxg7m7K E/AER69lWbQ5PDecGvn1TAXEqOeZ0p8ukxarYjp0ch1RI/S5Jj/N6uy0abNfMlwv+/RB q3dw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.203.7 with SMTP id fg7mr5903582qab.48.1338587661775; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.182.134 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:54:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <00fb01cd403e$4163c520$c42b4f60$@123openoffice.com> References: <00fb01cd403e$4163c520$c42b4f60$@123openoffice.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:54:21 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bring back the distributors page! From: Donald Whytock To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Not a committer here, but I've been following the list, and have seen much kvetching about pages containing outdated, inoperable and/or fraudulent links to outside sites, and how much trouble it is to go through them and clean out the trash. It may be helpful to people who want to buy support services for OO, but it's also a burden to the people who maintain the site, and little to no burden at all to a service vendor who places a link on the site and then goes out of business. Starting with a clean page at this point would simply mean the problem will come up again later. I know this is introducing work, but I'd like to make a suggestion: a distributor sign-up form that accepts a name, a link, an email address and a text blurb. Sign-ups get stored in a database and await review. The distributor page is either generated dynamically each time or is re-generated every night, from the database entries that have been reviewed and approved. Sign-ups should have timestamps, and should only last for X amount of time. At X minus some reasonable Y, an email is sent to the address in the sign-up advising them to renew. This reduces the burden on ASF volunteers, doesn't unduly burden distributors, and ensures users/buyers have timely information. Though I still think this might be better in a user forum. Don