Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 403479F24 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94407 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2012 13:16:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94335 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2012 13:16:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94325 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2012 13:16:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:16:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of acolorado@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.47] (HELO mail-qa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:16:35 +0000 Received: by qabg1 with SMTP id g1so987301qab.6 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:16:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/tqewKGEVqmACMYma79XQYjk1JTQYgeYANyxHspoAlY=; b=s0r1Z09GhlF8/kDVglO72nC6yqV7AahOIQ8h0/Qscgqf1h7OAqb1aGm6EXarbNt2HI CtLQ/83zAZElJqvP8uPJvfFkngfvVUVMnjnwVHCJN3stn8rXXr1ILX76ZJAXdAT70sT7 QtF6F0tUKMIBaDLCOlKBsVti+jq+0UOpfcGVEmaUlYdv5kNPv/2dwaOpuR9HwBxWY6xV wr4ZkEKN1SkM9BAqelaozFhCJRL+ANqLg2bn9Yh2F/Dox4GrK3nGjfjmr2QEnF4Er0Xw t0XElS9bsGL4JTYc42RR11XLBERIA3NoE55W7A/XM8N6Y4T4UtK+VeKJFQYWO7isfw+3 OPSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.136.140 with SMTP id r12mr1993464qct.74.1338642974727; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: acolorado@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.46.4 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 06:16:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1338601701.13767.YahooMailRC@web184511.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:16:14 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bXJG8LuZQ1gouQLA6xGcOpcqPWo Message-ID: Subject: Re: The reason I removed the program called Open Office 3.4 From: Alexandro Colorado To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/1/12, Graham Wright wrote: > On 02/06/2012 03:40, Dave Fisher wrote: >> On Jun 1, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Jihui Choi wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Alexandro Colorado >>> wrote: >>>> When you install it you agreed to open doc files in OpenOffice >>>> >>> Basically installing AOO doesn't mean we agreed to open MS office >>> formats in AOO. >>> And it's supposed there's an option page to choose whether we'll open >>> them in AOO or not. >>> But I couldn't find any similar option. I installed AOO 3.4 twice to >>> check this on Windows 7 32bit. >>> It's very strange and shame. It should be checked and fixed. >> I am unsure from your statement Choi (is it proper to use the second nam= e >> in conversation?) whether you were confirming the user's report. >> >> If what the reporter says is true then this needs to be a bugzilla and >> possible blocker for 3.4.1. How is this being tested on Windows? And is >> the result that installing AOO 3.4 on it does in fact cause (or even has >> as a default) the shifting of MS Office document types to be opened with >> AOO instead of MS Office. If MS Office is present then this must not be >> the the default option. >> >> The check must not be implicit to the user who just clicks continue and >> accept buttons through the WIndows installation process. Users must >> explicitly choose to have AOO override MS Office for MS Office documents= . >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> JiHui Choi >> >> > I often wonder why somebody that has Microsoft Office would have the > need to install Open Office anyway! > Isn't Open Office mainly for those people who cannot afford, or who are > unwilling to pay for Microsoft Office? > No openoffice is for people that want to SWITCH to a free software alternative. Most people have IE and they install Mozilla Firefox. --=20 Alexandro Colorado OpenOffice.org Espa=C3=B1ol http://es.openoffice.org