Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14B9A9EE5 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34045 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 11:30:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33838 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 11:30:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33793 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2012 11:30:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:30:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binoabn@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.175] (HELO mail-gh0-f175.google.com) (209.85.160.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:30:36 +0000 Received: by ghbz2 with SMTP id z2so6019927ghb.6 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 04:30:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=pcqRxqRpvSinvscrKtcknQs71HS4NTZNfc6DQaikg2k=; b=EMVueRYF3XxLBJ3H1D3Mxxf5Y2qS5jDn+NHR3EBV5uN9Lf9PlxQprgAFaM2gOovS3f 7itVSwj+v2eFkhevpNe03Jq/IJsz+Jwkl+mMOaFHkvMmhclg0vhqMqYKuHbNkVsDd2AG mtw81DH241HBv8MnxaClsYiaO32vY12fnoF1Sso3k0+Ryva0TeWSUAbVJZmEGBnKMLqB kIKUSLl9vTSEQmbIGhWwgcRqRFA/PP0XXC2RBzUV4q4exIjdcWOIUQM9deFUEC63BTnE GVLiMkEGZyYt++0Rqs5FlwlSyND0AJmpcBjXifBzDhvimW29/ADWG7GMIT4PqnJGF6yP 6ecA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.209.102 with SMTP id ml6mr6118109igc.60.1338982215139; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 04:30:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.52.196 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:30:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:30:15 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Tolerance and acceptance From: Albino B Neto To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi. 2012/6/6 Ross Gardler : > I move that there is no need to continue to fuel the fires of AOO vs > LO. The PPMC is now effective at ignoring anti-AOO materials on our > own lists. I suggest the PPMC should further silence inflammatory > posts that are anti-LO on our lists. > > For example, a recent post on ooo-users said: > > "The LO guys should have thought about that before forking OpenOffice > following Novell's siren's call. (remember the first major fork of > OpenOffice was Novell's Go-OO which incorporated the MS OOXML > support). > > In fact, it was their actions that killed the commercial prospects of > StarOffice, which Oracle had renamed "Oracle Open Office" (without the > .org)." > > I suggest that the ooo-users list is not the place for these kinds of > opinions, regardless of their validity. This is especially true when > they are made in response to a positive comment, which was "The main > goal has always been to create the best Office suite possible - so > let's unite around that." > > Our communities need to be welcoming. There is no chance of creating > unity if disunity is the response. I'm not suggesting this be tackled > onlist, that can be counter-productive too. I'm merely highlighting it > and encouraging individuals on the PPMC who agree with me to consider > sending a polite but firm request to stay focused on helping users on > the ooo-users list. +1 Albino > Ross