Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phoenix.wanglf@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPzejYh_V9Kwdtn3KHnQGWSKg2GXfpqAj9FUY=CQDgTY8BnJ8g@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAP-ksoh-Py+7qD1exBXHO4g9sYQJGqr1vd5Z6D83XUx3y2NxuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPzejYh_V9Kwdtn3KHnQGWSKg2GXfpqAj9FUY=CQDgTY8BnJ8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:36:01 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CABfS=dzczR+nHJNzuq9pD-stav-oED=HzLw_pgh5c1=CfZceDw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Should we start posting regular dev snapshot builds for 3.4.1 or
 3.5?
From: Li Feng Wang <phoenix.wanglf@gmail.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f642e983b3d1304c27dde7f

--e89a8f642e983b3d1304c27dde7f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

+1

Need timely build to verify resolved defects.

2012/6/15 Yong Lin Ma <mayongl@apache.org>

> +1
> I take this as a big sign that the project is on the right track and
> rolling.
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
> > I've seeing a lot of bug fixes coming in.  This is great!
> >
> > But none of us are perfect.  Sometimes bug fixes don't work or fixing
> > one bug causes another problem.    That is why we test.   And it is
> > best to test a bug fix before too much time has elapsed.
> >
> > Would it make sense to agree on a date to post an updated dev
> > snapshot, so we can verify the bug fixes and ensure that no new
> > instability has been introduced?  Maybe get into the practice of doing
> > this regularly, e.g., every 1 or 2 weeks or something.
> >
> > -Rob
>


-- 
Best Wishes, LiFeng Wang

--e89a8f642e983b3d1304c27dde7f--