Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD44DDC7D for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50466 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2012 11:29:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50145 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2012 11:29:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50130 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2012 11:29:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:29:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.113.200.5] (HELO homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com) (208.113.200.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:29:45 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0DF38A059; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 04:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [151.67.109.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: andrea@pescetti.it) by homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4047238A00C; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 04:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FEC4010.70001@apache.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:29:20 +0200 From: Andrea Pescetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RELEASE] [3.4.1] Bug 119229 as blocker (download new versions of extensions) References: <4FE7247E.7070703@apache.org> <4FE82AB8.3070102@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FE82AB8.3070102@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 25/06/2012 J=FCrgen Schmidt wrote: > On 6/24/12 4:30 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> This bug only affects the build infrastructure, but I propose it as a >> blocker for 3.4.1: >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3D119229 >> Unless the build process starts completely clean (and it didn't as of >> the 3.4.0 builds), the build would reuse an older, cached, version of >> the extension even if a newer one was specified in extensions.lst > I can see a benefit for the source release but not very critical. But > don't see the demand for our binary release because we can easy check i= t. If the build system has been improved and binary builds provided by the=20 project are now fine (in OpenOffice 3.4.0 the build system did not=20 cleanup previously downloaded extensions, resulting in the Spanish and=20 Italian dictionaries not being updated), it's of course OK for me. What=20 I'd like to ensure is just that this doesn't happen with the current=20 build process, otherwise it might be better to backport the fix. > If somebody volunteers to include, built and test it for 3.4.1 then I > would support it. > Any volunteer? I might have a look, but only in the pre-build phase (which should be=20 enough: you don't need to fully build the office to check what version=20 of the extension is downloaded). Regards, Andrea.