Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4FE8457E.5010309@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:03:26 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBTY2htaWR0?= <jogischmidt@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [CODE]: update code signing for Windows
References: <4FE45113.2080308@googlemail.com>
 <CAOGo0Va00hQ5bEAV8Vemx==b_BEwvFZ+7Y6dDrdwdmzHcOuKxQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <00b101cd509a$66793ea0$336bbbe0$@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <00b101cd509a$66793ea0$336bbbe0$@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 6/22/12 7:13 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> +1
> 
> Installing a small .exe is even better.  Hello World is always a good choice.
> 
> The .exe and the installer both must be signed, though not necessarily at the same time.
> 

I am not sure, signing an .exe is no rocket science and the signtool of
MS is well documented.  I am more interested in a working workflow with
a valid signed office setup binary (downloadable .exe) as outcome.

Juergen


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 10:06
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [CODE]: update code signing for Windows
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> Just a suggestion: since you are testing the signing process here, the
> actual content is irrelevant.
> So you could make a much smaller file that just installs a text file
> (or something like that).
> 
> [ ... ]
>