Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C64CA9C79 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 00:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24680 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2012 00:40:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 24621 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2012 00:40:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49380 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2012 00:03:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 02:04:55 +0200 From: gerard To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: openoffice 3.4 graphic display Message-ID: <20120616020455.1bde27f5@linux66.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Online-Scanned: by Cloudmark authority (on smtp06.online.nl) Hello, I would like to report that graphical display in openoffice 3.4 is worse than in the version which comes standard with debian. I installed 3.4 because it is said that it could handle .docx documents. After installing it opened those documents but the figures displayed were totally different from the figures in the word document. Also figures in .doc documents are no longer displayed at all. I had to uninstall the newer version and reinstall the debian version. I have no idea where to post this feedback. If required I am willing to test newer versions and comment on functionality on a regular basis. Thanks for looking in to this, Gerard Bekking