incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From zhangjf <zhan...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [IMPORTANT][Call for UX review] [Windows 8 certification]Test for "Section 11 Apps must support multi-user sessions" is not tested by Windows App Certification Kit
Date Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:14:54 GMT
How about just simply remove "- Fatal Error" from the dialog title
string? it won't add one more string for translation.

zhangjf

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Jürgen Schmidt
<jogischmidt@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 6/28/12 6:23 PM, zhangjf wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
>> <jogischmidt@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On 6/28/12 6:12 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> On 6/28/12 5:33 PM, zhangjf wrote:
>>>>> If it still needs more time for discussion,  I think it is also one
>>>>> option to only commit the new string change at first to catch up
>>>>> translation.  It should have no impacts on function without committing
>>>>> the code. In this way, please review the new dialog and string first.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it acceptable?
>>>>
>>>> sure, the way how it works is to check in the src file running localize
>>>> to create a new sdf, convert it, update pootle, doing the translation on
>>>> Pootle (to speed up and simplify the process) and finally merge it back
>>>> in svn.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I thunk the proposed solution is good and fulfill the requirements. Can
>>> we make a screenshot with the warning box and the English strings for
>>> review?
>>>
>>
>> Yuanlin's original first post in this mail thread contains the dialog
>> snapshot url at https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=78482.
>
> ok thanks, I have overseen this. I have 2 questions:
>
> 1. dialog title shows "Fatal Error", is it really a Fatal Error? I don't
> think so, we detect a running instance and close the application or
> better don't continue to start. I think it's more a warning, isn't it?
>
> 2. in case of error I think we have a better error icon, in case of a
> warning the used icon is ok from my pov.
>
> Juergen
>
>
>>
>>> In general I would support the proposed solution with a clear +1 to move
>>> forward immediately.
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> zhangjf
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Jürgen Schmidt
>>>>> <jogischmidt@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sorry for my top posting but I think this is very urgent and important.
>>>>>> When we want to integrate this in 3.4.1 we have to do it immediately,
>>>>>> means by the end of this week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The warning messages have to translated!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any opinions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Juergen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/27/12 11:13 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/27/12 3:23 AM, Lin Yuan wrote:
>>>>>>>> Currently in AOO, only part of the data in user profile is
locked and can
>>>>>>>> not access by mutiple instances. So as tested on Windows
Server 2008, AOO
>>>>>>>> will crash in such situation. The patch is not to really
support one user
>>>>>>>> to launch multiple instances on mutiple sessions case. According
to the
>>>>>>>> suggestion in Windows 8 Certification below:
>>>>>>>> *Note*: If an app does not support multiple user sessions
or remote access,
>>>>>>>> it must clearly state this when launched from this kind of
session.
>>>>>>>> With the patch, AOO will popup a warning dialog and exit
in this case. So
>>>>>>>> it will still not support mutiple user sessions for one user
but the UX is
>>>>>>>> more frendly than the current crash issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we have to define fast if we want include it for 3.4.1 or not.
It will
>>>>>>> require some translation effort that we have to organize in time
(e.g.
>>>>>>> updating Pootle etc.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Juergen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Lin Yuan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2012/6/27 Joost Andrae <Joost.Andrae@gmx.de>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> but in a Windows Terminal Server session you
have user profiles for each
>>>>>>>>>>> user.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This patch is for if you connect with Terminal Services
twice using
>>>>>>>>>> the same user account.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just wanted to make sure that there is no real problem
to get OpenOffice
>>>>>>>>> configured so it can be used within a multi user environment
(MS TS,
>>>>>>>>> Citrix, Sun SGD, or UNIX profiles). If the same user
connects a second time
>>>>>>>>> then there might be a locking problem with his profile
data. If you want to
>>>>>>>>> fix this then it's OK but in my opinion it's not really
needed because
>>>>>>>>> usually it should be prevented that one user accesses
the same user profile
>>>>>>>>> from another terminal (RDP, X11) session.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just my two € Cents, Joost
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message