incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From zhangjf <zhan...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [IMPORTANT][Call for UX review] [Windows 8 certification]Test for "Section 11 Apps must support multi-user sessions" is not tested by Windows App Certification Kit
Date Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:23:16 GMT
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
<jogischmidt@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 6/28/12 6:12 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 6/28/12 5:33 PM, zhangjf wrote:
>>> If it still needs more time for discussion,  I think it is also one
>>> option to only commit the new string change at first to catch up
>>> translation.  It should have no impacts on function without committing
>>> the code. In this way, please review the new dialog and string first.
>>>
>>> Is it acceptable?
>>
>> sure, the way how it works is to check in the src file running localize
>> to create a new sdf, convert it, update pootle, doing the translation on
>> Pootle (to speed up and simplify the process) and finally merge it back
>> in svn.
>>
>
> I thunk the proposed solution is good and fulfill the requirements. Can
> we make a screenshot with the warning box and the English strings for
> review?
>

Yuanlin's original first post in this mail thread contains the dialog
snapshot url at https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=78482.

> In general I would support the proposed solution with a clear +1 to move
> forward immediately.
>
> Juergen
>
>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> zhangjf
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Jürgen Schmidt
>>> <jogischmidt@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> sorry for my top posting but I think this is very urgent and important.
>>>> When we want to integrate this in 3.4.1 we have to do it immediately,
>>>> means by the end of this week.
>>>>
>>>> The warning messages have to translated!!!
>>>>
>>>> Any opinions
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>>
>>>> On 6/27/12 11:13 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>> On 6/27/12 3:23 AM, Lin Yuan wrote:
>>>>>> Currently in AOO, only part of the data in user profile is locked
and can
>>>>>> not access by mutiple instances. So as tested on Windows Server 2008,
AOO
>>>>>> will crash in such situation. The patch is not to really support
one user
>>>>>> to launch multiple instances on mutiple sessions case. According
to the
>>>>>> suggestion in Windows 8 Certification below:
>>>>>> *Note*: If an app does not support multiple user sessions or remote
access,
>>>>>> it must clearly state this when launched from this kind of session.
>>>>>> With the patch, AOO will popup a warning dialog and exit in this
case. So
>>>>>> it will still not support mutiple user sessions for one user but
the UX is
>>>>>> more frendly than the current crash issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> we have to define fast if we want include it for 3.4.1 or not. It will
>>>>> require some translation effort that we have to organize in time (e.g.
>>>>> updating Pootle etc.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Juergen
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Lin Yuan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/6/27 Joost Andrae <Joost.Andrae@gmx.de>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> but in a Windows Terminal Server session you have user
profiles for each
>>>>>>>>> user.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This patch is for if you connect with Terminal Services twice
using
>>>>>>>> the same user account.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just wanted to make sure that there is no real problem to get
OpenOffice
>>>>>>> configured so it can be used within a multi user environment
(MS TS,
>>>>>>> Citrix, Sun SGD, or UNIX profiles). If the same user connects
a second time
>>>>>>> then there might be a locking problem with his profile data.
If you want to
>>>>>>> fix this then it's OK but in my opinion it's not really needed
because
>>>>>>> usually it should be prevented that one user accesses the same
user profile
>>>>>>> from another terminal (RDP, X11) session.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just my two € Cents, Joost
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message