incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From chengjh <chen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: For Volunteer to Solve the Table Row Truncation Issue of "TableRowKeep" Feature
Date Mon, 18 Jun 2012 03:06:26 GMT
Thanks to Ji..And I have attached 8 samples with brief description to
verify this problem in this issue
120016<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120016>
 ..

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Yan Ji <yanji.yj@gmail.com> wrote:

> Jian Hong,
>
>  I create defect Bug 120016[1] to record the issue
>
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120016
>
> Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
>
> On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:24 PM, chengjh wrote:
>
> > Oliver,thanks a lot for your effort to look at this issue.Currently,there
> > isn't any issue about it in AOO Bugzilla.Our qe will help to open one for
> > it.And I will attach my samples for your reference.Good Weekend!
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> > orwittmann@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> On 15.06.2012 10:26, chengjh wrote:
> >>
> >>> There is an enhancement in OO 2.0.3, delivered with the name
> >>> "Compatibility
> >>> option: Keep-with-next attribute for table rows".
> >>> The details of the feature can be gotten from
> >>> http://www.openoffice.org/**development/releases/2.0.3.**html<
> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/2.0.3.html>.
> >>> A new (non-UI)
> >>> compatibility option "TableRowKeep" has been added to Writer
> documents. If
> >>> this option is enabled, a table row can be forced to keep together with
> >>> the
> >>> next row by setting the keep-with-next attribute to the first paragraph
> >>> within the first cell of this row. If this row is the last row of a
> table,
> >>> the last row tries to keep together with the next content behind the
> >>> table.
> >>> This compatibility option is disabled per default and enabled during
> >>> ww8/rtf import.
> >>>
> >>> This enhancement try to provide the behavior and layout compatibility
> of
> >>> MS
> >>> Word's table,within which the first para of the cell has the "Keep with
> >>> next(Paragraph Dialog->Line and Page Breaks in MS Word)"..
> >>>
> >>> This enhancement still has something to do in order to provide
> completed
> >>> compatibility.The known cases provided by "TableRowKeep" Feature as
> >>> followed:
> >>> *a)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the "keep with
> >>> next"
> >>>
> >>> attribute of the first para of the first row&column will works as
> normal,
> >>> The first row will not be moved to new page..*But if the contents
> within
> >>>
> >>> the first row is enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row
> will
> >>> not split, the part beyond page will be truncated in AOO..*
> >>> *b)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the "keep with
> >>> next"
> >>>
> >>> attribute of the first para of the 1 column/ 2 row  will make table
> from
> >>> the second row, moved to new page..*But if the contents within the
> second
> >>>
> >>> row is enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row will not
> >>> split, the part beyond page will be truncated **in AOO**..*
> >>> *c)*If the table is the first lower content of a page, the "keep with
> >>> next"
> >>>
> >>> attribute of the first para of the first row&column and  the 1 column/
> 2
> >>> row will works as normal, not moved to new page in MS Word..In AOO,the
> >>> table from the second row will be moved to new page..That's the
> >>> difference..Moreover,* if the contents within the First or second row
> is
> >>>
> >>> enough to be beyond the height of the page,the row will not split, the
> >>> part
> >>> beyond page will be truncated** in AOO**..*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This problem is related to the formatting of table and impact the table
> >>> formatting procedure deeply.Anyone is interesting in it?Thanks.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I am remembering the implemenation of this feature - a former colleague
> >> had implemented it.
> >> I will have a look at the corresponding code.
> >>
> >> Jianhong Cheng: Do you have a sample document already? Does there
> already
> >> exist a corresponding issue in AOO Bugzilla?
> >>
> >> Best regards, Oliver.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng
>
>


-- 

Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message