incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <orwittm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Request to Create a Branch for the "Implement the Loading of TOC and Improve TOC Fidelity with MS Word Binary Document"
Date Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:49:28 GMT
Hi,

On 29.06.2012 03:59, chengjh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have proposed to implement the loading of TOC and improve TOC fidelity
> with MS Word binary document..And now,we have finished the loading
> implementation part and delivered patch for review in
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119963. Because this is just
> the stage I code implementation, and more improvements within stage II/III/
> code implementation will be followed,moreover,special qe efforts are needed
> to cover the whole TOC function area and the impact areas,in order to
> decrease the negative impacts on the main stream,we request to create a
> branch and deliver our code implementation to the branch first, and then
> integrate the final qualified code to main..How about your comments?Thanks.
>
> Reference:
> [1]Candidate Proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Feature+Planning
> [2]Wiki with FS and SDD:  http://wiki.services.**openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/
> TOC <http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/TOC>
>

In general I think it makes completely sense to work on a branch for a certain 
feature which takes more implementation, testing etc. efforts.

In this special case I am not sure, if it is needed.
I am currently reviewing the patch for issue 119963. It works fine from my point 
of view. There are no open ends, it is complete and does not cause any problems 
as far as I can see. Thus, I am planning to apply this patch to trunk today or 
on Monday.
Thus, from my point of view this feature milestone and the following ones are 
still small enough to handle them without an additional branch.


Best regards, Oliver.

Mime
View raw message