incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS]What is the criteria for 3.4.1 release blocker?
Date Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:46:12 GMT
On 6/21/12 1:42 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/21/12 12:40 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
>> I wonder if any one can help to update this criteria to 3.4.1 wiki ?
> 
> I am not sure what you mean, do you mean to add a link on the wiki page
> to the definition of showstopper?
> 
> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4.1+Feature+Planning
> 
>  by the way I moved this page under Releases -> AOO 3.4.1 but the link
> still works
> 
> The idea was to reduce the redundant version number in each page name,
> see
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots
> 
> But as I have noticed afterwards it doesn't really work because the page
> itself is under OOOUSERS directly. I thought it would be saved
> hierarchical as in mediawiki :-(
> 

changed back to include the version number but keeping the hierarchy
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4.1+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots

Did I mentioned that I don't like confluence wiki :-(

Juergen

> 
>> It was my favorite, but I'm on vacation now and difficult to update the wiki from
my phone...
> 
> enjoy your vacation
> 
> Juergen
> 
>>
>> - Simon
>>
>>
>> 发自我的 iPhone
>>
>> 在 2012-6-21,7:54,De Bin Lei <leidb@apache.org> 写道:
>>
>>> Juergen, thank for your comments, now the criteria is more clear, thanks
>>> again.
>>>
>>> 2012/6/21 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@googlemail.com>
>>>
>>>> On 6/21/12 5:51 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>>>>> I think safety is of high value.
>>>>>
>>>>> That includes security issues and also data loss/corruption.  The last
>>>> includes crashers that result in unrecoverable loss of work.  Hidden loss
>>>> of work and document corruption that does not appear until the document is
>>>> opened later is particularly serious.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We used in general the following criteria (details where we are more
>>>> less based on can be foud under [2])
>>>>
>>>> - crashes (including data loss/corruption)
>>>> - security fixes
>>>> - regressions
>>>>
>>>> I would also include
>>>> - memory leaks
>>>> when a fix is available and it is well tested that nothing else breaks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - maintenance issues (like updating reference type library, version
>>>> strings, images, ...)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A micro release like 3.4.1 is only for fixing serious problems and not
>>>> to introduce new features. Excepting new translations.
>>>>
>>>> Minor releases, eg. 3.5, can include any kind of fix, features and
>>>> improvements. Bigger UI changes should be discussed and probably better
>>>> included in a major release.
>>>>
>>>> See also [1] and especially [2]
>>>>
>>>> We should update these pages on demand to reflect our guideline how we
>>>> want handle this in the future. A common understanding is of course
>>>> important here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Release_criteria
>>>> [2] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Stopper
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> - Dennis
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: dongjun zong [mailto:zongdj001@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 20:31
>>>>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]What is the criteria for 3.4.1 release blocker?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think high severity regression issue, common usage function related
>>>> issue
>>>>> should be considered as release blocker.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/6/21 Ji Yan <yanji.yj@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> From my point of view, security and high usability issue should be
set
>>>> as
>>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/6/21 debin lei <leidb@apache.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi, All
>>>>>>> I noticed that there are some issues, which are proposed as 3.4.1
>>>> release
>>>>>>> blocker recently. However, I am not sure what is the criteria
for the
>>>>>>> release blocker?
>>>>>>> Is it regression or impact serious ? Or high benefit to risk
ratio from
>>>>>> dev
>>>>>>> view ?
>>>>>>> I think maybe consider more things, but not sure.
>>>>>>> So if you can give your criteria and discuss here to make the
things
>>>> more
>>>>>>> clear will be very helpful.
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards.
>>>>>>> Lei De Bin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Lei De Bin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> 
> 



Mime
View raw message