incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From J├╝rgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki
Date Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:46:06 GMT
On 6/5/12 9:13 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:35 PM, chengjh <chengjh@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page  has accumulated plenty
>> of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical
>> documents and so on..Currently,the planning and project tracking parts have
>> been moved to
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Wiki+Home,that means a
>> new start of the project.Because the two wikis are two different wiki
>> software systems,moreover, there are existing different writing styles
>> between them and writers need accounts for them respectively, it is not
>> convenient for writers to write wiki articles when switching between
>> them...So, I propose to create a new wiki for developers to record
>> technical documents,technical review,proposals/ideas,function specification
>> and design,and so on by sub-project categories, for example,we can move the
> 
> We actually already have a 3rd wiki, for developers:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOODEV/Wiki+Home
> 
> Here is the history:
> 
> The MediaWiki instance was the legacy wiki, used by OpenOffce.org project
> 
> When the Apache project was create, we had two new wiki's created.
> Remember at that time we had not yet migrated the MediaWiki over to
> Apache, and it was not certain whether we would be able to do it.
> 
> The two new wikis were:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Wiki+Home    This
> was the "community wiki" where anyone could create an account and edit
> content.
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOODEV/Wiki+Home   This
> wiki was restricted to committers.
> 
> The OOODEV wiki made it suitable for content that might make it into a
> product release.  For example logos, draft help, etc.  If this was put
> on an open wiki, where anyone would access it, then we'd need to do
> much more work to track permissions if we wanted to move something
> from the wiki into SVN for use in a release.  Having a wiki that was
> only writable by committers ensure that the content is always under
> ALv2.
> 
> If we want to go to a single wiki, I think we should resolve the
> license issue.    And we should also encourage CTR by ensuring that
> there is an email notification for changes.  We do that for CWiki
> today.

we can put a disclaimer on each existing page where the license
situation is unclear. For all new stuff we require ALv2. We can make
this sure by a clear license info page for future contributions. And
during the registration process for new users we can ask for accepting
the license for new contributions as well to make sure that all new
registered users are aligned.

Existing users can be notified to renew their account and acknowledge
the license change or their account get deleted.

Just an idea

Juergen


> 
> -Rob
> 
> 
>> scope of teams section from the old OO wiki to the new wiki, or *extend the
>> scope of  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Wiki+Home to
>> include these areas. *Thus, in the future,the new wiki will only keep a
>> link to the old OO wiki which takes as the history data and continue to
>> accumulate new project data to benefit the project and contributors..Please
>> comment...thanks.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng


Mime
View raw message