incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From drew <d...@baseanswers.com>
Subject Re: Next steps for Symphony and AOO
Date Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:10:46 GMT
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 13:19 -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> 
> --- Gio 14/6/12, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.mail@wtnet.de> ha scritto:
> 
> ...
> 
> > >
> > > And I think it's not just about emotions. If you take A
> > > as base and pick the enhancements of B you'll get an
> > > enhanced A. You won't probably
> > > remove features from A but take only some of B.
> > >
> > > So the decision between Method I and II is also the
> > > decision to work for an enhanced OOo/AOO or for an
> > > enhanced Symphony.
> > 
> 
> I might have missed something but the idea behind both
> options is to arrive to the same product, that means
> reusing as much available code as possible.
> 
> 
> > Also a clear +1 from me to go the way of option I.
> > 
> 
> 
> It would be interesting to could put the options
> in some time metric.
> 
> My guess (and it's only a guess, not an estimate)
> ...
> 
> Option I : 2 years.
> Option II: 8 months.
> 
> Personally, I think I will work on both options
> at the same time: 

*chuckling*... good choice.


> I do want to have an early
> Symphony BSD port. No objections if I start
> merging patches into Symphony once uploaded? :).

Oh no, a wild variant (mutant) version is born.. ;-) why not, you have
the skill and the clay in your hands.

//drew

> 
> Pedro.
> 
> 



Mime
View raw message