Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C78DC294 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89528 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2012 18:32:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89465 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2012 18:32:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89457 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2012 18:32:57 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:32:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:32:56 +0000 Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so3315821vbb.6 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:32:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.69.69 with SMTP id c5mr1110590vdu.43.1336761175631; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:32:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.190.13 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:32:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1336760287.64103.YahooMailNeo@web160903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1336760287.64103.YahooMailNeo@web160903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:32:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Feedback on the CMS From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, Joe Schaefer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Joe Schaefer wrot= e: > With 1100 builds so far the ooo-site CMS instance > is only 350 builds behind www.apache.org as the > most-used CMS tree so far.=C2=A0 I monitor the CMS logs > daily to evaluate usage and this project publishes > about as often as all our other projects combined, > which really makes me wonder where we'd be here if > the org had never created the CMS in the first place. > Wow. Impressive stats. I know I use it nearly on a daily basis. > > The ooo-site is far and away the largest instance at > over 9GB total.=C2=A0 The reason I'm writing here is to > ask general questions about user satisfaction with > the CMS: > > 1) Is there any aspect of the CMS that needs immediate > =C2=A0=C2=A0 improvement? > It works for me. > 2) Are you satisfied with the workflow, or are there areas > =C2=A0=C2=A0 that could stand improvement? > For the novice, it would be useful to have more guidance text on what to do next. So maybe a streamlined "easy" interface, and then the full version. > 3) Is there anything that should be done to encourage more > =C2=A0=C2=A0 users who are not committers to use the CMS to submit patche= s > =C2=A0=C2=A0 to the list? > There is a live markdown preview of changes, but none given for HTML pages. Since most of the openoffice.org site is still HTML, this would be very useful and help catch errors before staging. > 4) Are there any UI features you'd like to see implemented, > =C2=A0=C2=A0 either in the web interface or the publication script? > In the web interface, something that would poll the build and automatically refresh to the staging server when the build is complete. > Thanks in advance for taking the time to answer a few of these!