Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C45C7CF68 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 08:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22338 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2012 08:27:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22127 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2012 08:27:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22091 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2012 08:27:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2012 08:27:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevingrignon.oo@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2012 08:27:13 +0000 Received: by yhjj56 with SMTP id j56so8336yhj.6 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 01:26:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CnPuAHu0TTO+Cyi+nW2pD+IC5hc2tA3oLIRGSB8TCKc=; b=WIYhQz64CoMOWShgK+blF/9V0Ao/2hs9BOSwL9ZA3bfyf+Rpryedk3qGIeCpGRagX4 LuJP5aLQ+B81KIy+98/0lis5eLnsVDQw8nixxTdFxQLx5D8nGfBB6VyVAnB7zyxr36v4 jFmYyWtwY++LNx4BDNiKokI9cxSKtVMj3MAkRJxkDtP3nvK3FxTonyFT+d75SV8j4230 52086Mjkq6DJMRCa04PgMQkI1EC4w5r3WF+97d1F8PJvwb4ZuwUL8EISbBGaEtp9e6r4 w+TZTNPihmQ83uqsdYI/mKzrwy2Apk405oKnRo+EVd0RoCjR8mu2WhYKOk4jIroW2NAc Z74g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.77.201 with SMTP id d49mr27704684yhe.85.1336552012650; Wed, 09 May 2012 01:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.189.74 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:26:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FAA2200.4010200@a-w-f.de> References: <4FAA1BB8.3080303@a-w-f.de> <20120509072929.GB24763@localhost> <4FAA2200.4010200@a-w-f.de> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 16:26:52 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]: Apache OpenOffice Next-Gen logo... From: Kevin Grignon To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fa9b7f01a7c04bf9643d6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf300fa9b7f01a7c04bf9643d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 All good thoughts. Again, I think it is best to summarize our current thoughts on what the brand is intended to represent, then explore design alternatives to realize the brand message. Regards, Kevin On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Andre Fischer wrote: > On 09.05.2012 09:29, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >> Hi *, >> >> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:24:40AM +0200, Andre Fischer wrote: >> >>> On 09.05.2012 08:33, Kevin Grignon wrote: >>> >>>> Michael, >>>> >>>> Thanks for sharing the logo mockups. Also, I appreciate you >>>> acknowledging >>>> my earlier contributions - most gracious. >>>> >>>> With AOO 3.4 just hitting the streets, now is the time to think about >>>> performing some design research and explorations in support of branding >>>> for >>>> AOO 4.0. >>>> >>>> Perhaps you could create an AOO 4.0 logo concepts page on the wiki to >>>> capture these great ideas. I also have a number of concepts that I would >>>> like to share with you and others for input. >>>> >>> >>> Maybe we can do a logo contest similar to the one Apache Flex did? >>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/**flex/logo-contest.html >>> >> >> >> IMHO it is better to have some profession designer volunteering, >> I recall the ugly OOo 3 splash screen >> http://wiki.services.**openoffice.org/wiki/Art/** >> Gallery/OOo3_Splash_Screen >> > > I see what you mean. Although some of them are actually quite good. > And flex does probably have a more design oriented user base. > > > Stella's was far better that the one that got selected. >> >> >> Regards >> > --20cf300fa9b7f01a7c04bf9643d6--