Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20128CAC1 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 09:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43372 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2012 09:06:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43308 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2012 09:06:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43300 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2012 09:06:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2012 09:06:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lilyzhao8@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qa0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2012 09:06:41 +0000 Received: by qady23 with SMTP id y23so83560qad.0 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 02:06:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eUW3HyyJ52/FKgDmKu+xLQ3vduOVQy65OXhbO06okfI=; b=haV7EU7YGFOcx+otlHiEEewzUOsTtqwdA+Uux2NZmZjVBA7I9YCpD8hpXJFiMTiHcw TojsPx61dlOC+kn7JwXlif1rAyzA82DiiieB34k6p5E/GU4E14TSgZ6aTHpf5hVKGDEX JNmmnL2qgVIcLNPYebjKd/4mwKKFZvZHBWsMePMYaOZkigtCSOu0TXCpmSdMXzxcRUrN zSFE1BjwIC2zcHALImiifIeoaHwUh+jl36YFhiP48QEb9uU/O/maNnWs+vjnvPhDBFjO oZ0xhhPUCih4GmC+vE3tgBTD7S2rA+B+z9c1KlRauLsvQH6IBCvHX51X0ZKiLTx3jW9d bXTA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.211.9 with SMTP id gm9mr2546927qab.78.1336035981115; Thu, 03 May 2012 02:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.246.68 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2012 02:06:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 17:06:21 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: After AOO 3.4? From: Xia Zhao To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fa9530fc25504bf1e1e5b --20cf300fa9530fc25504bf1e1e5b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes, I plan: - QA website update - QA process update - QA automation framework build up and related guide publish - QA case management tool - QA sample file db I will propose all these tasks against qa mail list and call for volunteers. Best regards, Lily 2012/5/2 Zhe Liu > In addition, QA site is too old and need updated. > > 2012/5/2 Yan Ji : > > From QA perspective, I think we need to build up the QA project and > process asap. Automation framework and test tool should be available soon > for all tester in this project. > > > > Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji > > > > On Apr 29, 2012, at 12:32 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> I'm already starting to get questions on what we'll be doing after AOO > >> 3.4 is released. Based on previous conversations on this list, I'm > >> able to speak confidently about a few things: > >> > >> 1) We'll probably graduate to a Top Level Project > >> > >> 2) IBM says they will contribute Symphony source code after 3.4 is > released > >> > >> 3) We have some initial feature ideas for AOO 4.0 on the wiki: > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Feature+Planning > >> > >> 4) We also have some ideas listed for an AOO 4.1: > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Feature+Planning > >> > >> Beyond that, do we have anything to say? > >> > >> I've heard some discussions that we might want an AOO 3.4.1, which > would: > >> > >> A) Add some additional translations > >> > >> B) Fix any important bugs that are found in AOO 3.4 > >> > >> C) Uncertain if it would have new features? > >> > >> What time frame would this be? It seems like it takes around 4-6 > >> weeks to iterate on dev builds, do regression testing, cut a Release > >> Candidate, have a two-stage release vote and get the new build > >> distributed. So it seems it would need to be at least that far out, > >> plus whatever time it takes to do the translations and bug fixing. > >> > >> Does anyone want to start a wiki page for AOO 3.4.1 and start > >> collecting proposed translations and bugs for that release? > >> > >> -Rob > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > From aliuzhe@gmail.com > --20cf300fa9530fc25504bf1e1e5b--