Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kay.schenk@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4FA7EDA0.20602@googlemail.com>
References: <4F99DCEA.80608@gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksojowyDeo4KnHW4m+-4=7q+kPYwkCgCw3F2psYd2e8f6UQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F9B1C21.60701@gmail.com>
	<CAGj3217reOttzkDiP9fbs17J3qDMu+Pe3XP_ZMy2MEF4qZAL5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F9EDBCC.4060306@wtnet.de>
	<4F9F0250.2040106@gmail.com>
	<4F9F11D4.6080705@wtnet.de>
	<4F9F1CA8.1080302@t-online.de>
	<CAGj3214ncABOt6B8hQC4BWvX-dhBuk3nZrXFaNJXbEd+0_SGmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F9FBEF1.70403@t-online.de>
	<CAGj32152RxEVeoRx+QrPHyYYVDLZE8-yxVvR1af=z2HDPs5Wdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FA38A2D.2020801@googlemail.com>
	<CAGj32153hO4auAY+VfFvCWez0Wt_QZgCCsLf_Jstf2-Kao9siQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FA43A74.7030105@wtnet.de>
	<2BB9F9F7-1582-48AD-93F9-102A6624FF7B@comcast.net>
	<4FA48A82.2090901@wtnet.de>
	<4FA65A4C.70806@apache.org>
	<4FA66C58.7030209@wtnet.de>
	<0669F1D681C3428DA9C5E416AD77A9FD@googlmail.com>
	<4FA69C83.4040804@wtnet.de>
	<4FA6ABCE.1010800@googlemail.com>
	<4FA6D93F.2020607@apache.org>
	<4FA7A627.5040100@apache.org>
	<CAGj3214Fem3A1fVQ822-6ugmJ2ZUxqHO_E0yOP1OEGb=WwVv6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FA7EDA0.20602@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 09:33:40 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAGj3216g_0ZVyoCVoxOFi5V2rwFFac2A0ae-OMf_C8s7YCow=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RELEASE] new DL test...needs review and comments,
 and probably correction
From: Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043d656736007704bf74d50e

--f46d043d656736007704bf74d50e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:43 AM, J=FCrgen Schmidt
<jogischmidt@googlemail.com>wrote:

> On 5/7/12 5:32 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Andrea Pescetti<pescetti@apache.org>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>  On 06/05/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
>>>  It's much improved now, but it seems we still miss several files unles=
s
>>>> the upload is still ongoing. ...
>>>>
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-****
>>>> deb_LG.tar.gz
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_****3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-****
>>>> rpm_LG.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> for virtually all values of LG (ar, cs, de and so on).
>>>>
>>>>
>>> All files listed in
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/****download/test/checksums_new_****dl.html<h=
ttp://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/checksums_new_**dl.html>
>>> <http://www.openoffice.**org/download/test/checksums_**new_dl.html<http=
://www.openoffice.org/download/test/checksums_new_dl.html>
>>> >
>>>
>>> are now available. So now there shouldn't be any missing files any
>>> longer.
>>>
>>>
>> OK, thanks for this...the "official" checksums file should now be living
>> in
>>
>>  http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/checksums/**
>> 3.4.0_checksums.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/checksu=
ms/3.4.0_checksums.html>
>> .
>>
>>  I need tomake sure this is the most recent version before moving on.
>>
>> And, I do think this needed its own page...
>>
> you mean the checksums have to be on a separate page? Why? Why make it so
> complicate? I don't understand the reason.
>
> Pleas explain it to me, I am eager to learn ;-)
>

I can't really give you an explanation except to say this is how it was
done in the past. The current checksums page is quite large...they COULD be
tacked on to other.html I guess, but it just seems cleaner this way.


>
> Juergen
>
>
>
>
>> ..back in a bit after I deal with personal home related issues.
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>  Andrea.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


--=20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------
MzK

"Well, life has a funny way of sneaking up on you
 And life has a funny way of helping you out
 Helping you out."
                            -- "Ironic", Alanis Morissette

--f46d043d656736007704bf74d50e--