Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBA4D96D2 for ; Tue, 1 May 2012 16:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21600 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2012 16:20:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21549 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2012 16:20:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21539 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2012 16:20:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 May 2012 16:20:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kay.schenk@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.47] (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 May 2012 16:20:28 +0000 Received: by lagw12 with SMTP id w12so2585916lag.6 for ; Tue, 01 May 2012 09:20:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=64PwpwRB3tp+NQ/r3STxXe6QpZRVjrgktV2CSDPIqhA=; b=B3LWfRQIfZAZ8u8/rcCPr7c4UAlcbo5ThGIpLApOzo2EXePlYpfmdYny9BUu411AHc E+koBH6sTXT+vKv3fqO8Q836u1x19FYrEJqOTV4IsWkYOMOsB/Y2GhBY+qO6EjmrOy1T SGsw6CGq9BlNY54B3ZYz7umQfILtc+oKNpPkif6jLl6bcp1OauwpnB1Vtftu0ze+FRoN YDEZYkf0GUOR4Ub2m9Psfa+F8AQbjcnv+X/L6iWbrREBjsbL2n0yu8Va891wc1xy13Gt 6ZKv9DHpM1S9m0mUeRGZ4XTh8EQIVckeDo+T1KZyrmeMTHp/wDGjk2TyPY/Ybopbh9RF ofUQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.40.102 with SMTP id w6mr8675289lbk.59.1335889206464; Tue, 01 May 2012 09:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.113.67 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:20:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1335843034.39179.YahooMailNeo@web160905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <4F99DCEA.80608@gmail.com> <4F9B0213.5020304@apache.org> <4F9B1C21.60701@gmail.com> <4F9EDBCC.4060306@wtnet.de> <4F9F0250.2040106@gmail.com> <4F9F11D4.6080705@wtnet.de> <4F9F1CA8.1080302@t-online.de> <1335843034.39179.YahooMailNeo@web160905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 09:20:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RELEASE] new DL test...needs review and comments, and probably correction From: Kay Schenk To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, Joe Schaefer Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4efe29989c528004befbf175 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e0cb4efe29989c528004befbf175 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Kay- I've setup a new script for you to use for > Openoffice downloads from Apache mirrors- simply > replace "closer.cgi" with "aoo-closer.cgi" in your > paths. Please don't forget this or users could > be directed to mirrors which have opted out of > carrying AOO releases. > > > > Joe -- I will take a look, and thanks a MILLION! hmmm...interesting comment as well. > > >________________________________ > > From: Kay Schenk > >To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > >Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:43 PM > >Subject: Re: [RELEASE] new DL test...needs review and comments, and > probably correction > > > >Regina-- > > > >Thanks for all this work. Please see comments inline below... > > > >On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Regina Henschel >wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> my test results are below, all on German WinXP Home, SP3. > >> > >> kind regards > >> Regina > >> > >> Marcus (OOo) schrieb: > >> > >> Am 04/30/2012 11:21 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 04/30/2012 11:37 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Am 04/30/2012 04:53 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Kay Schenk > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 04/27/2012 01:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Andrea Pescetti< > pescetti@apache.org > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Kay Schenk wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Please take a look at and give feedback on a test page for the > new > >>>>>>>>>> /download/index.html page at: > >>>>>>>>>> > http://www.openoffice.org/****download/test/index_new_dl.****html< > http://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/index_new_dl.**html> > >>>>>>>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/index_new_dl.html> > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Yes, it's a bit strange with lots of nonsense at the top that I > >>>>>>>>>> wanted > >>>>>>>>>> you to see, but will of course go away in production. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The page is nice, but it's the concept that leaves me dubious. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> We have another thread > >>>>>>>>> http://comments.gmane.org/****gmane.comp.apache.incubator.**< > http://comments.gmane.org/**gmane.comp.apache.incubator.**> > >>>>>>>>> ooo.devel/16219 >>>>>>>>> apache.incubator.ooo.devel/**16219< > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.ooo.devel/16219> > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> where there seems to be consensus towards a solution that: > >>>>>>>>> 1) Uses SF (and possibly Apache) for the web-based downloads > >>>>>>>>> 2) Does not phase out MirrorBrain, and uses it for the updates > >>>>>>>>> (i.e., > >>>>>>>>> downloads initiated by OpenOffice with the "Look for updates" > >>>>>>>>> function) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> That's what I understand as well. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> oh -- OK. I thought we were going to use MirrorBrain for 3.3 DLs as > >>>>>>> well > >>>>>>> -- i.e. what Marcus will be working on. I know right now, we're > using > >>>>>>> SourceForge for that though. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The "possibly Apache" in 1) is due to the fact that I haven't > >>>>>>>> understood > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> yet > >>>>>>>>> what technology Apache will be using and if Apache will > distribute > >>>>>>>>> only > >>>>>>>>> sources or binaries too (it's obvious that we as a project will > >>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>> sources and binaries, but I'm not 100% sure that Apache wants to > put > >>>>>>>>> binaries on its mirrors too: I think so). > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Well it's not all that complicated actually. Take a look at the > >>>>>>> security > >>>>>>> patch info page... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/****security/cves/CVE-2012-0037.****html > > >>>>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-0037.html> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> and you can see what the link looks like. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Actual source/binaries are, for us, put in: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/****incubator/ooo/< > http://www.apache.org/dist/**incubator/ooo/> > >>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/> > >>>>>>> **> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This said, you could be right in having issues tracking down > problems. > >>>>>>> Right now, the SF setup is more "user friendly" in my opinion. I > >>>>>>> thought we > >>>>>>> were *required* to use Apache for downloads, but maybe we've > gotten a > >>>>>>> dispensation for this release. Though I didn't think is was 100% > >>>>>>> someplace > >>>>>>> else. I admit I haven't kept up as much as I should have though. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The other issue is how will it LOOK to users -- one moment they may > >>>>>>> be one > >>>>>>> place; if they happen to do a shift-reload, they may go someplace > >>>>>>> else with > >>>>>>> an entirely different look and feel. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Fact is, we should avoid the random selection as much as possible, > >>>>>>>>> mainly to > >>>>>>>>> be able to quickly identify problems, and you will see details in > >>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>> thread. The cleaner separation we can get, the better. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> So how about something very simple: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1) AOO 3.4 downloads use SourceForge by default from the > >>>>>>>> /download/index.html page. Just like they are doing today. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This WOULD make things a lot simpler. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> But we also have a links there that point to Apache mirrors for: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> a) Hashes and detached signatures > >>>>>>>> b) source distribution > >>>>>>>> c) a link to the full release tree > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Well, SF will need to implement in their sidebar or the main page > for > >>>>>>> openoffice.org they have, right? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Anyway, good conversation. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In other words, no rolling the dice, noting fancy. 100% of normal > >>>>>>>> users will download from SF. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2) When we enable the automated updates, in a week or two, then we > >>>>>>>> decide what we want to do. Maybe we do it via SF. Maybe > MirrorBrain. > >>>>>>>> Maybe a mix, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On the other side, release time is approaching and I can only hope > >>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> talks between Peter Poeml (MirrorBrain author) and Apache Infra, > >>>>>>>>> that had > >>>>>>>>> started on this list, are progressing now. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I think it is too late for any of those talks to influence how > we > >>>>>>>> deal > >>>>>>>> with AOO 3.4 initial downloads. But maybe the update downloads in > a > >>>>>>>> couple of weeks. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -Rob > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Andrea. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> > ------------------------------****----------------------------**--** > >>>>>>> ------------ > >>>>>>> MzK > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> "Well, life has a funny way of sneaking up on you > >>>>>>> And life has a funny way of helping you out > >>>>>>> Helping you out." > >>>>>>> -- "Ironic", Alanis Morissette > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ok, I am hoping this will be about the last, final review on the new > >>>>>> download/index.html -- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> prototype at: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.** > apache.org/download/test/**index_new_dl.html< > http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_new_dl.html> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This assumes SourceForge ONLY, and that the 3.4 pre-built client > packs > >>>>>> will be in the hiearchy as the 3.3 is -- stable, etc. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Naturally NONE of the links will work until something gets out there > >>>>>> and > >>>>>> there is a TON of alerts which I will of course eventually comment > out. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I've tested the following: > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. > >>>>> Linux with Firefox --> Linux x86-64 RPM de --> the text in the > pop-ups > >>>>> makes sense --> OK > >>>>> > >>>>> 2. > >>>>> Windows XP with MSIE --> error --> the detailed error message says: > >>>>> > >>>>> Line: 104 > >>>>> Char: 1 > >>>>> Error: Identifier, string or number expected > >>>>> Code: 0 > >>>>> URL: http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/** > >>>>> index_new_dl.html< > http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_new_dl.html> > >>>>> > >>>>> Line: 286 > >>>>> Char: 2 > >>>>> Error: 'languages' is not defined > >>>>> Code: 0 > >>>>> URL: http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/** > >>>>> index_new_dl.html< > http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_new_dl.html> > >>>>> > >>>>> --> finally only a blue box for the extensions > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> hmmm...well I shouldn't have changed anything that caused this, but > >>>> definitely NOT good. OK, thanks. What are you showing for your > >>>> "language" -- i.e. according to your UA string? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Good that you've asked. I remember that we have this webpage: > >>> > >>> http://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/analyze.html< > http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html> > >>> > >>> So, I've updated it a bit and nowI get the following browser data: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> window.location.href http://ooo-site.apache.org/** > >>> download/test/analyze.html< > http://ooo-site.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html> > >>> navigator.platform Linux x86_64 > >>> navigator.platform.**toLowerCase() linux x86_64 > >>> navigator.userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0.1) > >>> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1 > >>> navigator.userAgent.**toLowerCase() mozilla/5.0 (x11; linux x86_64; > >>> rv:2.0.1) gecko/20100101 firefox/4.0.1 > >>> navigator.language de-DE > >>> navigator.userLanguage undefined > >>> navigator.systemLanguage undefined > >>> navigator.javaEnabled() Yes > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> window.location.href http://www.openoffice.org/** > >>> download/test/analyze.html< > http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html> > >>> navigator.platform Win32 > >>> navigator.platform.**toLowerCase() win32 > >>> navigator.userAgent Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; > >>> SV1) > >>> navigator.userAgent.**toLowerCase() mozilla/4.0 (compatible; msie 6.0; > >>> windows nt 5.1; sv1) > >>> navigator.language undefined > >>> navigator.userLanguage de > >>> navigator.systemLanguage de > >>> navigator.javaEnabled() Yes > >>> > >>> > >>> It seems that on Linux the "navigator.language" is set. On Windows this > >>> is not set but the "navigator.userLanguage" and > >>> "navigator.systemLanguage". All 3 are handled in "download.js" (or in > >>> your new "download_new_dl.js"). > >>> > >>> Maybe it's helpful to output some debug messages around this area? > >>> > >>> @All: > >>> Can others please test on Windows with MSIE and Firefox? I really hope > >>> it's just my Windows XP (in a Virtualbox VM). > >>> > >> > >> > > > >> With Opera 11.62 > >> ============================= > >> > >> Calling http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/** > >> index_new_dl.html< > http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_new_dl.html> > >> > >> The green download box is missing totally. > >> > >> Calling http://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/analyze.html< > http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html> > >> results in > >> > >> navigator.platform: Win32 > >> navigator.UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; de) Presto/2.10.229 > >> Version/11.62 > >> navigator.UserAgent lower case: opera/9.80 (windows nt 5.1; u; de) > >> presto/2.10.229 version/11.62 > >> navigator.UserAgent lower case: -1 > >> getLink(): undefined > >> getPlatform(): Windows > >> getLanguage(): German > >> > >> > >> window.location.href http://www.openoffice.org/** > >> download/test/analyze.html< > http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html> > >> navigator.platform Win32 > >> navigator.platform.**toLowerCase() win32 > >> navigator.userAgent Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; de) > Presto/2.10.229 > >> Version/11.62 > >> navigator.userAgent.**toLowerCase() opera/9.80 (windows nt 5.1; u; > >> de) presto/2.10.229 version/11.62 > >> navigator.language de > >> navigator.userLanguage de > >> navigator.systemLanguage undefined > >> navigator.javaEnabled() Yes > >> > >> > >OK -- well this is NOT good, but what kind of results do you get with > Opera > >for: > > > >http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/ > > > >same thing or ???? > > > >Despite the fact that Opera is supposed to be the most W3 compliant > >browser, I know folks have had issues with it... > > > > > >with Windows Internet Explorer 8 > >> ==============================**== > >> Calling http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/** > >> index_new_dl.html< > http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_new_dl.html> > >> > >> All looks OK. > >> > >> Calling http://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/analyze.html< > http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html> > >> results in > >> > >> navigator.platform: Win32 > >> navigator.UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; > >> Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR > 3.0.4506.2152; > >> .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; BRI/2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; > >> OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3; Microsoft.com Optimized > IE8) > >> navigator.UserAgent lower case: mozilla/4.0 (compatible; msie 7.0; > windows > >> nt 5.1; trident/4.0; .net clr 2.0.50727; .net clr 1.1.4322; .net clr > >> 3.0.4506.2152; .net clr 3.5.30729; infopath.2; bri/2; .net4.0c; > .net4.0e; > >> officeliveconnector.1.5; officelivepatch.1.3; microsoft.com optimized > ie8) > >> navigator.UserAgent lower case: -1 > >> getLink(): undefined > >> getPlatform(): Windows > >> getLanguage(): German > >> > >> > >> > >> window.location.href http://www.openoffice.org/** > >> download/test/analyze.html< > http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html> > >> navigator.platform Win32 > >> navigator.platform.**toLowerCase() win32 > >> navigator.userAgent Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; > >> Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR > 3.0.4506.2152; > >> .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; BRI/2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; > >> OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3; Microsoft.com Optimized > IE8) > >> navigator.userAgent.**toLowerCase() mozilla/4.0 (compatible; msie 7.0; > >> windows nt 5.1; trident/4.0; .net clr 2.0.50727; .net clr 1.1.4322; .net > >> clr 3.0.4506.2152; .net clr 3.5.30729; infopath.2; bri/2; .net4.0c; > >> .net4.0e; officeliveconnector.1.5; officelivepatch.1.3; > microsoft.comoptimized ie8) > >> > >> navigator.language undefined > >> navigator.userLanguage de > >> navigator.systemLanguage de > >> navigator.javaEnabled() Yes > >> > >> with Seamonkey 2.9 > >> ================== > >> > >> All looks OK. > >> Calling http://www.openoffice.org/**download/test/analyze.html< > http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html> > >> results in > >> > >> navigator.platform: Win32 > >> navigator.UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) > Gecko/20120422 > >> Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9 > >> navigator.UserAgent lower case: mozilla/5.0 (windows nt 5.1; rv:12.0) > >> gecko/20120422 firefox/12.0 seamonkey/2.9 > >> navigator.UserAgent lower case: -1 > >> getLink(): undefined > >> getPlatform(): Windows > >> getLanguage(): German > >> > >> > >> > >> window.location.href http://www.openoffice.org/** > >> download/test/analyze.html< > http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html> > >> navigator.platform Win32 > >> navigator.platform.**toLowerCase() win32 > >> navigator.userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) > >> Gecko/20120422 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9 > >> navigator.userAgent.**toLowerCase() mozilla/5.0 (windows nt 5.1; > >> rv:12.0) gecko/20120422 firefox/12.0 seamonkey/2.9 > >> > >> navigator.language de-DE > >> navigator.userLanguage undefined > >> navigator.systemLanguage undefined > >> navigator.javaEnabled() Yes > >> > >> > >OK, thanks again. I did discover and correct a rather odd bug that was > >affecting my simulated UA testing. Hopefully I can finish up with this > >tomorrow if nothing else comes up. > > > > > > > >-- > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >MzK > > > >"Well, life has a funny way of sneaking up on you > >And life has a funny way of helping you out > >Helping you out." > > -- "Ironic", Alanis Morissette > > > > > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Well, life has a funny way of sneaking up on you And life has a funny way of helping you out Helping you out." -- "Ironic", Alanis Morissette --e0cb4efe29989c528004befbf175--